ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2025
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Groups May Have Underused The Emergency Department For Nonavoidable Visits, 2018-22.
Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telemedicine Adoption, US Ambulatory Visits, and Total Medical Spending, 2019-2023.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Declining use of percutaneous coronary intervention across population groups, 2011-2022.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Impact of telemedicine use on outpatient-related CO2 emissions: estimate from a national cohort.The American journal of managed care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the decades preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency department (ED) use increased more rapidly for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients than for advantaged patients, often because of barriers to accessing office-based care. However, it remains unknown whether the pandemic has had durable effects on socioeconomic disparities in ED use. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ED visits in the US, using multipayer claims data. We used a difference-in-differences approach to compare ED visit rates between March 2020 and August 2022 with rates from the same months of 2018-19. Among 15.6 million ED visits, potentially avoidable visits persistently declined for all insured populations during the pandemic period. Potentially nonavoidable visits also declined early in the pandemic but rebounded to more than 95 percent of expected rates. However, stratifying by insurance revealed that this rebound occurred among commercially insured and Medicare fee-for-service patients; potentially nonavoidable visits only returned to about 75 percent of expected rates among Medicaid and dual-eligible patients. Although this suggests a beneficial reduction in potentially avoidable ED use, it also indicates the simultaneous emergence of a disparity wherein socioeconomically disadvantaged groups may be underusing the ED for potentially higher-acuity illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.