Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40030102›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2025

Association Between Telehealth Initiation Of Stimulant Therapy And New Substance Use Disorder Diagnoses.

Joanne Constantin, Sean Esteban McCabe, Emily Pasman, Timothy Wilens, Kao-Ping Chua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne ConstantinJoanne Constantin (constjoa@med.umich.edu), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sean Esteban McCabeSean Esteban McCabe, University of Michigan.
Emily PasmanEmily Pasman, University of Michigan.
Timothy WilensTimothy Wilens, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kao-Ping ChuaKao-Ping Chua, University of Michigan.

Funding

Trajectories of Prescription Nonmedical Drug MisuseR01DA031160 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SEAN ESTEBAN MCCABE · 2011 to 2026
$3.7M
Insurance-related barriers to medications for opioid use disorder in private and Medicaid plansR01DA056438 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUA, KAO-PING, NGUYEN, THUY DIEU · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Evaluating Policy Interventions to Decrease Excessive and Risky Perioperative Opioid PrescribingR01DA057284 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUA, KAO-PING, WALJEE, JENNIFER FILIP · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031160NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056438NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA057284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy makers have temporarily extended COVID-19 pandemic-related flexibilities allowing controlled substance prescribing via telehealth without in-person visits. To inform debates regarding whether these flexibilities should be permanent, we used commercial and Medicaid claims to evaluate the risk for newly diagnosed substance use disorders (SUDs) associated with telehealth versus in-person initiation of stimulant therapy. Analyses included 77,153 patients ages 12-64 without prior SUD diagnoses who initiated stimulant therapy during 2021. The outcome was a new diagnosis for SUD within 365 days of initiation. The prevalence of new SUDs was higher in the telehealth versus in-person group (3.7 percent versus 3.2 percent), as was the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities, which are known SUD risk factors. In adjusted analyses, telehealth initiation was not an independent risk factor for new SUDs, as the higher risk for this diagnosis disappeared when we controlled for psychiatric comorbidities. The same was true when we stratified the analyses by age, except among people ages 26-34. These findings suggest that extending telehealth flexibilities for stimulant prescribing might not increase the risk for newly diagnosed SUDs in most patients. When stimulants are being prescribed via telehealth, measures to prevent misuse may be particularly important among people ages 26-34.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsCOVID-19Substance-Related DisordersTelemedicineAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMedicaidMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesYoung AdultCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID40030102
PMCPMC12919471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.