ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2025
The Passion Tax: Valuation Disparity among Academic and Nonacademic Surgery Subspecialty.
Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcademic surgery requires commitment beyond financial incentives. Nevertheless, the monetization of clinical effort measured by work relative value units (wRVUs) is not well characterized. Previous work indicates academic surgery charges a premium of 16% compared with nonacademic counterparts. In this study, we analyzed patterns in the valuation of academic and nonacademic work across general surgery subspecialties. STUDY
designMedical Group Management Association datasets (calendar year 2014, 2018, and 2022) were queried for total cash compensation (TCC) and wRVU among colorectal (CR), general, surgical oncology, plastic and reconstructive, transplant, trauma, and vascular surgery. TCC, wRVU, and TCC per wRVU were compared between academic and nonacademic. ANOVA and t -test were used as appropriate; a p value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Linear regression was used to perform trend analysis to evaluate TCC per wRVU over time by subspecialty.
resultsTCC in all academic subspecialties was less than nonacademic at all years. wRVUs in academic subspecialties were greater than nonacademic at all years. TCC per wRVU in all academic subspecialties was less than nonacademic at all years. Differences between academic and nonacademic TCC per wRVU varied from -$36 of -52% (trauma surgery; p = 0.03) to +$4 of +6% (CR; p = ns). Trend analysis shows that the gap between academic and nonacademic TCC per wRVU in multiple GS subspecialties is widening.
conclusionsAcademic exacts a passion tax over nonacademic for virtually all GS subspecialties. As measured by TCC per wRVU, academic TR charges the highest tax (-52%; p = 0.03), followed by plastic and reconstructive surgery (-40%; p = 0.01), surgical oncology surgery (-27%; p = 0.02), vascular surgery (-12%; p = 0.02), transplant surgery (-10%; p = ns), and GS (-9%; p = 0.04). Only academic CR yields a positive "return" (+6%; p = ns). Embarking on a career in academic demands a passion for values that transcend financial gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.