ArticlePloS one2025
Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 10.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Patients with Cerebellar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) and [18F]-FDG PET findings in spinocerebellar ataxia type SCA27B.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Psychomotor and non-motor correlates of cognition in spinocerebellar ataxias Types 1, 2, 3, and 6.Brain communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (SCA10) is an autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, characterized by epilepsy, ataxic symptoms, and cognitive impairments linked to Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome (CCAS). The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale (CCAS-S) has been developed to identify CCAS across various cerebellar pathologies.
objectiveTo determine whether patients with SCA10 exhibit CCAS using the CCAS-S, and to compare its effectiveness with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). A secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of demographic and clinical data on CCAS-S performance.
methodFifteen patients with SCA10 and fifteen matched controls underwent assessments using the CCAS-S, the MoCA, the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using ROC curve analysis, comparing total and subcategory scores between groups. Demographic and clinical data were examined for relations with CCAS-S scores.
resultsThe CCAS-S effectively distinguished cognitive impairments in SCA10 patients, showing satisfactory sensitivity and specificity (AUC of 0.83). Although no significant differences were found in the AUCs between CCAS-S and MoCA (p = 0.45), the CCAS-S demonstrated a significantly larger effect size in the comparison between patients and control group (d = 2.33). Cognitive performance was poorer in patients than in controls (p = < 0.001), with depressive symptoms and age having a significant impact on CCAS-S outcomes.
conclusionsPatients with the SCA10 mutation exhibit CCAS. Besides the significant cognitive impairment, also detected by MoCA, the CCAS-S score was significantly affected by indicators of depressive mood and age, highlighting the importance of considering these variables during outcome analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.