SynthesisPloS one2025
A systematic review of post COVID-19 condition in children and adolescents: Gap in evidence from low-and -middle-income countries and the impact of SARS-COV-2 variants.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk Factors of COVID-19 Severity and Related Death in Children in the Post-Pandemic Era.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Long COVID in the Pediatric Population: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Children and adolescents: Respiratory infection and long-term effects longitudinal study (CARE Study): Study protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- Is fatigue associated with adolescents' mental health? A pre- vs. post-COVID-19 cross-sectional survey comparison.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Characterizing acute and persistent symptoms of COVID-19 among adults and children in rural Zambia, 2020-2022.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Review
- Assuring Primary Healthcare Services to Vulnerable Children in a Disadvantaged Suburb of Rome Metropolitan City During the Pandemic: Responses to the Crisis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The long-term health consequences following COVID-19 have largely been reported in adult populations living in high-income countries. We therefore did a systematic review of post COVID-19 condition symptoms reported in children and adolescents (<18 years), aiming to identify and include publications from low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). From EMBASE, Medline, and Pubmed until the 30th of October 2023, we searched all studies reporting original and complete data of long-term outcomes of at least 20 children or adolescents under 18 years of age with a history of confirmed acute COVID-19 infection. We excluded non-English publications, pre-prints, unreviewed articles, grey literature, studies with inaccessible full text, and those limited to a specific population. Risk of Bias was assessed using STROBE guidelines for observational studies. We used descriptive narrative analysis to summarize the findings. Forty studies reporting 825,849 children and adolescents; the median age of those with persistent symptoms was consistently in the adolescent age range but not all studies included young children (<5 years). Only one study, with 58 participants aged 6-17 years, population was from a LMIC. Studies relied on symptom reporting rather than objective measures of organ dysfunction. The definition of post COVID-19 condition varied; most studies used persistent symptom duration of two or three months or more. However, since the symptom onset was not specified, it was difficult to identify which study is truly consistent with WHO's definition of post COVID-19 condition. Prevalence of post COVID-19 condition ranged from 1.8% to 70% but with marked heterogeneity between study populations and reporting criteria including the severity of acute COVID presentation. Most studies were undertaken when the Alpha variant was the predominant strain. The prevalence of post COVID-19 condition ranged from 6.7% to 70% in the Alpha variant-, 23% to 61.9% in the Delta-, 17% to 34.6% in the Omicron-, and 3.7% to 34% in the Other-variant predominated studies. The most reported symptoms were fatigue (70%), headache (37.5%) and respiratory symptoms (35%); fatigue was most reported in all variant subgroups. Only half of the studies included a control group. The variations in study population, reporting methods, reliance on symptom reporting alone and lack of control groups make it challenging to determine the impact of COVID-19 on post COVID health in children and adolescents. The lack of data from LMIC populations especially infants and young children is a major gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.