ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its association with cardiovascular disease risk and common risk factors amongst healthcare workers in Pakistan.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at a higher risk of CVD. However, little is known about the association between MetS and CVD risk in healthcare workers in Pakistan. We aimed to assess the prevalence of MetS and its components and examined the association between MetS and 10-year CVD-risk using Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and common CVD risk factors amongst HCWs working in a private healthcare system in Pakistan. This cross-sectional study uses baseline data from an existing CVD risk screening program for employees at a private healthcare system in Pakistan. MetS was diagnosed using the American Heart Association cut-offs for Asian population. Healthcare workers were divided into MetS positive and negative groups; demographics, MetS components and CVD risk were compared between these groups. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of MetS with 10-year CVD-risk and its risk factors. In 1,807 healthcare workers, 677 (37%) had MetS and 48 (2.7%) had a high 10-year CVD-risk. Of the MetS components, low High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) 1,467 (81%) and elevated waist circumference (WC) 1,049 (58%) were the most prevalent. Compared to MetS negative group, MetS positive group had a higher proportion of high-risk CVD (0.7% vs. 5.9%; p: <0.01). After controlling for known risk factors, we found that the odds of having MetS is 5.7 times higher (aOR: 5.67 (95% CI: 2.39-13.4) in those with high CVD risk. In addition, we found a significant association between screening positive for depression and MetS (OR: 2.42 (95% CI: 1.24-4.72). Interestingly, tobacco use was not significantly associated with MetS (OR: 0.81 (95% CI: 0.58-1.15). We found a high prevalence of MetS amongst Pakistani healthcare workers and of the MetS components, low HDL and elevated WC were the most prevalent. Along with biologic risk factors (age, sex and family history of CVD), depression significantly increases the odds of having MetS. In addition, both intermediate and high CVD risk groups have significant association with MetS. Comprehensive, workplace based screening and management programs are required for HCWs to mitigate the risk of MetS and cardiovascular disease. Early identification and treatment of these risk factors may be cost-effective in lowering MetS burden in low-middle income countries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.