ArticlePloS one2025
Auditory and tactile frequency mapping for visual distance perception: A step forward in sensory substitution and augmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision is crucial for daily tasks and interacting with the environment, but visual impairment can hinder these activities. Many sensory substitution products and studies prioritize providing abundant and accurate information, yet often overlook the inherent relationship between different modalities, potentially preventing users from receiving information intuitively. This study investigated the representation of visual distance using auditory and vibrotactile frequency through a series of psychological cross-modal matching experiments. By establishing mapping functions between auditory/vibrotactile frequency and visual distance, we aim to facilitate the design of sensory substitution devices that take visual distance information (ranging from 1 m to 12 m) and convert it into non-visual information (auditory frequency within the range 47-2764 Hz or vibrotactile frequency within the range 10-99 Hz). Results show distinct patterns regarding the correlation between visual distance and frequency in both auditory (auditory frequency-to-visual distance) and vibrotactile (vibrotactile frequency-to-visual distance) domains. The prevailing trend (59%) was a monotonic negative correlation (i.e. higher frequencies are associated with shorter distances), while 24% of participants demonstrated a consistently positive correlation. Additionally, we compare this study with our previous investigations into the reverse cross-modal mapping of visual distance-to-auditory frequency and visual distance-to-vibrotactile frequency. We reveal common patterns between these two studies (negative and positive correlations), suggesting a bidirectional mapping between visual distance and frequency in both auditory and vibrotactile domains, and the potential for new sensory substitution devices for those with visual impairment by integrating underlying cross-modal mechanisms to enhance intuitive and natural human-machine interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.