ArticleJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2025
Self-Supervised Learning for Feature Extraction from Glomerular Images and Disease Classification with Minimal Annotations.
Article in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Streamlining the Histopathologic Workflow in Diabetic Kidney Disease with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Similarity-guided swarm of models: enhancing semi-supervised learning in computational pathology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Domain-adaptive semi-supervised learning for efficient rare pathological lesion detection with minimal annotation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Multiple instance learning using pathology foundation models effectively predicts kidney disease diagnosis and clinical classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced interpretation of kidney transplant biopsy: focus on rejection.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2025Review
- Optical histopathology based on the nonlabeling analysis with multiphoton excitation imaging.Pathology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Deep learning has great potential in digital kidney pathology. However, its effectiveness depends heavily on the availability of extensively labeled datasets, which are often limited because of the specialized knowledge and time required for their creation. This limitation hinders the widespread application of deep learning for the analysis of kidney biopsy images. Methods: We applied self-distillation with no labels (DINO), a self-supervised learning method, to a dataset of 10,423 glomerular images obtained from 384 periodic acid–Schiff-stained kidney biopsy slides. Glomerular features extracted from the DINO-pretrained backbone were visualized using principal component analysis. We then performed classification tasks by adding either k-nearest neighbor classifiers or linear head layers to the DINO-pretrained or ImageNet-pretrained backbones. These models were trained on our labeled classification dataset. Performance was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). The classification tasks encompassed four disease categories (minimal change disease, mesangial proliferative GN, membranous nephropathy, and diabetic nephropathy) and clinical parameters such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hematuria. Results: Principal component analysis visualization revealed distinct principal components corresponding to different glomerular structures, demonstrating the capability of the DINO-pretrained backbone to capture morphologic features. In disease classification, the DINO-pretrained transferred model (ROC-AUC=0.93) outperformed the ImageNet-pretrained fine-tuned model (ROC-AUC=0.89). When the labeled data were limited, the ImageNet-pretrained fine-tuned model's ROC-AUC dropped to 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.80), whereas the DINO-pretrained transferred model maintained superior performance (ROC-AUC, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 0.90). The DINO-pretrained transferred model also exhibited higher AUCs for the classification of several clinical parameters. External validation using two independent datasets confirmed DINO pretraining's superiority, particularly when labeled data were limited. Conclusions: The application of DINO to unlabeled periodic acid–Schiff-stained glomerular images facilitated the extraction of histologic features that could be effectively used for disease classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.