Observational studyInfection2025
Increased incidence of blood culture contaminations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Observational study in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections before, during, and after the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a registry-based cohort study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Secular trends of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients: insights from a longitudinal Swiss study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Blood Culture Contamination Creep Independent of COVID-19 Pandemics: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBlood culture contamination (BCC) is mainly caused by commensal bacteria, during sample collection. It results in unnecessary antibiotic exposure, prolonged hospitalisation, additional microbiology workup and significant adverse health-economic burden. We aimed to investigate the short- and long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of BCC.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study at Geneva University Hospitals (HUG). We included all BCCs from January 2018 to December 2023, collected as part of a prospective hospital-wide surveillance by the infection control team. Data were analyzed using segmented Poisson regression models to evaluate BCC incidence rate ratios (IRRs) across three periods: pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019), during COVID-19 (2020-2021), and post-COVID-19 peak (2022-2023).
resultsOut of 456,873 collected blood cultures, 1,247 BCCs were identified (0.27%). The contamination rate per 1000 samples increased from 1.53 pre-COVID-19 to 2.94 during COVID-19 and 3.52 post-COVID-19. Compared to the pre-COVID-period, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for BCC increased during COVID-19 (IRR 1.84, 95% CI 1.58-2.15) and post-COVID-19 peak (IRR 2.29, 95% CI 1.97-2.66). During COVID-19, proportions of BCC were increased in intensive care units (27.4%, n = 127) and returned to baseline level post-COVID-19 (17.3%, n = 93, p < 0.001); whereas, in other wards, BCC remained elevated (42.2%, n = 227) in the post-COVID-19 period.
conclusionsWe observed a significant rise in BCC incidence during and after the COVID-19 peak. The persistently elevated post-peak rates highlight ongoing challenges in regaining optimal aseptic blood culture collection practices and the need for further exploration of persisting factors increasing BCC rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.