Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029560›Full record

SynthesisForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Cadaver clots: a systematic review of the literature.

Biagio Solarino, Laura Ambrosi, Marcello Benevento, Davide Ferorelli, Claas Buschmann, Simona Nicolì

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Biagio SolarinoSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. biagio.solarino@uniba.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3096-8998
Laura AmbrosiSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9825-1739
Marcello BeneventoSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4895-0182
Davide FerorelliSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8150-7476
Claas BuschmannInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Building 28, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6161-3009
Simona NicolìSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5908-0920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cadaveric blood is ubiquitous, and observed in various forms-liquid, coagulated, and clot-like-during autopsies. Understanding its state in postmortem vessels is essential for both scientific research and forensic investigations. Pulmonary thromboembolism (PT) is a leading cause of sudden death, often requiring medicolegal evaluation. While thrombus formation is primarily explained by Virchow's triad, the distinction between antemortem, agonal, and postmortem clot (PMC) pathogenesis remains debated. This study aims to systematically review the literature to clarify the morphological and pathological differences among these entities in forensic practice. A systematic review of PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted using predefined key terms: "clot," "thrombus," "chicken-fat," "agonal," "postmortem," and "autopsy." Articles were screened for relevance, and 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The review highlights a significant gap in comparative studies addressing antemortem versus postmortem clots. The literature lacks a consensus regarding their definitions, macroscopic and microscopic characteristics, pathogenesis, and relevance to determining the cause and timing of death. Existing studies present conflicting interpretations, limiting the reliability of forensic differentiation. The current understanding of antemortem, agonal, and postmortem clots remains incomplete. Our findings underscore the need for further research to establish standardized criteria for distinguishing clot types, which is crucial for forensic pathology and medicolegal evaluations.

Indexed as

Postmortem ChangesThrombosisCadaverForensic PathologyHumansPulmonary EmbolismAgonal periodAgonal thrombiChicken fat clotsClots in forensicPostmortem clots

Identifiers

PMID40029560
PMCPMC12799637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.