Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029558›Full record

Observational studyThe Psychiatric quarterly2025

International Trends in Antidepressant Consumption: a 10-year Comparative Analysis (2010-2020).

Alberto Peano, Francesco Calabrese, Konstantinos Pechlivanidis, Riccardo Mimmo, Gianfranco Politano, Manuela Martella, Maria Michela Gianino

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alberto PeanoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5/Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Francesco CalabreseDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5/Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Konstantinos PechlivanidisDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5/Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo MimmoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5/Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Gianfranco PolitanoDepartment of Control and Computer Engineering, Polytechnic of Turin, 10138, Turin, Italy.
Manuela MartellaDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5/Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy. manuela.martella@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-6902
Maria Michela GianinoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5/Bis, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to analyze country-specific antidepressant consumption rates across 30 OECD countries, comparing them with the OECD average from 2010 to 2020. This analysis examines annual variations in consumption and identifies potential trends over time. Using a retrospective observational design, the study employs pooled secondary data from 30 OECD countries. A time trend analysis was conducted to assess overall and country-specific linear and quadratic trends, modeling the variation in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per 1,000 inhabitants from 2010 to 2020. Findings reveal a significant increase in antidepressant consumption across most countries. The mean DDD value rose from 52.42 in 2010 to 69.5 in 2020. Three distinct trend patterns emerged: linear, concave, and convex. While 15 countries exhibited a significant linear increase, five showed a plateauing trend, and others experienced exponential growth with a convex trajectory. Denmark was the only country to show a decline in consumption, whereas Norway displayed no significant change over time. These results underscore a notable rise in antidepressant use across most OECD countries, alongside variations in consumption trajectories. By assessing and comparing national consumption rates, this study highlights the importance of international collaboration in addressing mental health challenges and optimizing healthcare accessibility and outcomes.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDrug UtilizationOrganisation for Economic Co-Operation and DevelopmentHumansInternationalityRetrospective StudiesAntidepressive AgentsAntidepressant consumptionAntidepressant drugsMental health disordersOECD trends

Identifiers

PMID40029558
PMCPMC12213856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.