Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029552›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2025

Career coaching to support medical student career decision-making: a randomized controlled trial.

Daan A H Fris, Annelies E M van Vianen, Edwin A J van Hooft, Matthijs de Hoog, Anne P J de Pagter

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daan A H FrisDepartment of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.h.fris@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0676-0495
Annelies E M van VianenWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3931-0394
Edwin A J van HooftWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6625-5362
Matthijs de HoogDepartment of Neonatal & Pediatric Intensive Care, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-581X
Anne P J de PagterDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Stem Cell Transplantation, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7051-1872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated whether career coaching can reduce medical students' career decision-making stress through clarifying students' self-concept, increasing career decision self-efficacy, and lowering perceived time pressure to make a career decision. We evaluated the effectiveness of a coaching intervention (including five individual coaching sessions over eight months) using a randomized-waitlist controlled trial design. Participating medical master's students completed a first survey (T1). The intervention condition (n = 94) started the coaching program right away. The waitlist-control condition (n = 130) started after 8.5 months. Participants in the intervention condition completed a second (T2) survey three weeks after their last coaching session. Participants in the waitlist-control condition received the second survey 8.5 months after registration. Data were analyzed using multilevel path modelling. The total effect of coaching on career decision-making stress was significantly negative (-0.17; 95% CI [-0.31, -0.06]), reflecting a small to moderate effect size. This total effect was partially mediated (i.e., explained) by career decision self-efficacy (-0.02; 95% CI [-0.06, -0.00]). Exploratory analyses suggested that coaching only clarified the self-concept of students with a relatively negative coaching attitude at T1. Moreover, coaching resulted in more changes in career choices and an increase in students' career choice certainty. This study demonstrates that coaching is effective in reducing medical students' career decision-making stress and increasing their career decision self-efficacy and career choice certainty. High-quality career decision-making is important because it is associated with higher job satisfaction, well-being, and performance. Medical schools may consider providing coaching to students to support their career decision-making.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceDecision MakingMentoringStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleSelf ConceptSelf EfficacyStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCareer choiceCareer coachingCareer decision-making stressMedical studentsSpecialty choice

Identifiers

PMID40029552
PMCPMC12572062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.