Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029538›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025

Virtual-simulation boosted neural network dose calculation engine for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Zirong Li, Yaoying Liu, Xuying Shang, Huashan Sheng, Chuanbin Xie, Wei Zhao, Gaolong Zhang, Qichao Zhou, Shouping Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zirong Li *Department of Research Algorithms, Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361001, P. R. China.
Yaoying Liu *School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, P. R. China.
Xuying ShangSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, P. R. China.
Huashan ShengDepartment of Research Algorithms, Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361001, P. R. China.
Chuanbin XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Wei ZhaoSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, P. R. China.
Gaolong ZhangSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, 102206, P. R. China.
Qichao ZhouDepartment of Research Algorithms, Manteia Technologies Co., Ltd, Xiamen, 361001, P. R. China. zhouqc@manteiatech.com.
Shouping XuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, P. R. China. xusp@cicams.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3189-9680

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine 2024-I2M-C&T-B-076National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 12375359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation method is widely recognized as the gold standard for precision in dose calculation. However, MC calculations are computationally intensive and time-consuming. This study aims to develop a neural network-based dose calculation engine using a virtual simulation database, producing dose distributions with accuracy comparable to MC dose calculations. We established an unrestricted virtual simulation database employing specific rules and automated optimization techniques. Individual dose distributions for each beam were stored. A neural network was then constructed and trained using a 3D Dense-U-Net architecture. The model's accuracy was validated in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, and lung cancer. A total of 31,967 single-beam doses were collected from 2,382 virtual plans. For clinical beam doses, the gamma passing rates under the 1 mm/1% and 2 mm/2% criteria improved significantly from 13.4 ± 4.8% and 37.5 ± 9.4% to 77.5 ± 7.7% and 95.6 ± 2.5%, respectively, using the model. The mean computation time was 0.017 ± 0.002 s. We successfully developed an automated training workflow for a neural network-based dose calculation model in fixed-beam IMRT. This workflow enables the generation of a substantial training dataset from a relatively small clinical dataset, resulting in a model that excels in accuracy and speed.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerRadiation DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansMonte Carlo MethodRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedDose calculationIMRTNeural network (NN)Radiation therapy (RT)Virtual-simulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.