ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Virtual-simulation boosted neural network dose calculation engine for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation method is widely recognized as the gold standard for precision in dose calculation. However, MC calculations are computationally intensive and time-consuming. This study aims to develop a neural network-based dose calculation engine using a virtual simulation database, producing dose distributions with accuracy comparable to MC dose calculations. We established an unrestricted virtual simulation database employing specific rules and automated optimization techniques. Individual dose distributions for each beam were stored. A neural network was then constructed and trained using a 3D Dense-U-Net architecture. The model's accuracy was validated in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, cervical carcinoma, and lung cancer. A total of 31,967 single-beam doses were collected from 2,382 virtual plans. For clinical beam doses, the gamma passing rates under the 1 mm/1% and 2 mm/2% criteria improved significantly from 13.4 ± 4.8% and 37.5 ± 9.4% to 77.5 ± 7.7% and 95.6 ± 2.5%, respectively, using the model. The mean computation time was 0.017 ± 0.002 s. We successfully developed an automated training workflow for a neural network-based dose calculation model in fixed-beam IMRT. This workflow enables the generation of a substantial training dataset from a relatively small clinical dataset, resulting in a model that excels in accuracy and speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40029538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.