ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
The impact of DaVinci simulator competitions on medical student interest in robotic surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery has expanded significantly over the last decade. To help train learners, many institutions have implemented various training methods. Studies have shown that simulation training is an effective tool to develop skills for both residents and attending physicians. However, its influence on medical student training is unclear. Medical students were asked to compete in a 4-month da Vinci robotic console simulation tournament. Participants were given unlimited attempts to achieve the highest score possible on four different modules. Questionnaires were completed before and after the tournament to assess baseline demographics, surgical confidence, and perceptions toward robotic surgery. Performance data from the simulator was collected for each participant. A total of 12 medical students completed the tournament. Paired T-test analysis of pre-survey and post-survey questionnaires demonstrated significant increases in reported interest in robotic surgery (p < 0.001) and surgery overall (p = 0.0028). Self-reported surgical confidence using the simulator also increased significantly (p = 0.0043). There was an increase in overall performance across all modules when comparing first and last attempts (p < 0.001), (p < 0.001), (p = 0.0031), and (p = 0.011). Spearman's rank correlation analyses showed an association between overall performance and number of attempts for two of four modules (p = 0.0063) and (p = 0.046). Tournament-style simulation training increased medical students' surgical skill dexterity, confidence and interest in robotic surgery. Additional research with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully characterize the effectiveness of robotic surgical training for medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40029509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.