ArticleJA clinical reports2025
Visibility of video laryngoscope in high-illuminance environment simulating outdoor conditions: effects of screen conditions and polarized sunglasses.
Article in JA clinical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-brightness anti-reflective monitor for videolaryngoscopic tracheal intubation under direct sunlight: a mannequin study.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVideo laryngoscopes generally increase the success rate of tracheal intubation and clinical outcome compared to traditional direct laryngoscopes. However, there is a concern that their effectiveness can be compromised in bright outdoor environments. The impact of polarized sunglasses on the visibility of a video laryngoscope in a high-illumination environment simulating outdoor conditions was assessed. Additionally, the effect of screen smudges on screen visibility was examined.
methodsA high-illumination environment was created using artificial light equivalent to daylight outdoors. Twenty-four anesthesiologists participated in this study. A commercially available laryngoscope was utilized to evaluate the visibility of the monitor screen and visualize the larynx. The experiment involved a fixed order sequence, including viewing with the naked eye, wearing sunglasses, cleaning the screen without wearing sunglasses, and cleaning the screen while wearing sunglasses, to evaluate visibility with each intervention. A visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) was used to evaluate the visibility of the larynx displayed on the screen.
resultsPolarized sunglasses significantly enhanced visibility, with a median VAS score of 12 compared to 5 (P = 0.004). Moreover, cleaning the monitor screen significantly improved visibility more than wearing sunglasses alone, with a median VAS score of 38 compared to 12 (P = 0.002). Additionally, wearing sunglasses after cleaning the monitor screen provided even better visibility compared to only cleaning the screen, with a median VAS score of 57 compared to 38 (P = 0.002).
conclusionsBased on these findings, it is suggested that when using a video laryngoscope outdoors in sunny conditions, the first step to address impaired visibility should be to clean the screen. Wearing sunglasses, if possible, can also be effective in improving visibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.