Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029487›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2025

Knowledge and utilization of obstetric ultrasound and associated factors among pregnant mother in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anteneh Gashaw, Zerihun Figa, Yonas Abebe, Abel Desalegn Demeke, Yohanes Sime

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anteneh GashawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia. antenehgashaw77@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8396-2186
Zerihun FigaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Yonas AbebeDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Abel Desalegn DemekeDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Yohanes SimeDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.

Funding

Dilla University 1000140604497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstetric ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive imaging method that employs sound waves to explore the abdominal and pelvic areas of a pregnant woman. It is recommended to have at least two ultrasound scans during pregnancy, one in the first trimester and another in the second trimester, to identify potential complications and improve perinatal outcomes. While this practice is widely implemented in developed nations, its utilization in many African countries remains suboptimal. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the level of knowledge and utilization of obstetric ultrasound among pregnant women in Africa, providing insights into its awareness and utilization across the continent.

methodA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Extensive literature searches were carried out across various databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Scopus, and African Online Journal databases. The pooled prevalence was estimated using a weighted inverse variance random-effects model. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q-test and I

resultA total of 622 articles were initially identified, with 23 ultimately meeting the inclusion criteria for this review, including five studies that addressed both knowledge and utilization of obstetric ultrasound. The overall knowledge level among pregnant women in Africa regarding obstetric ultrasound was estimated at 74.33% (95% CI 63.27-85.38%), while the pooled proportion of utilization was 63.3% (95% CI 51.59-75.02%). Subgroup analysis revealed that both knowledge and utilization levels were highest in Western Africa, whereas knowledge was lowest among pregnant women in Eastern Africa. Pregnant women with good knowledge of obstetric ultrasound were significantly more likely to utilize the service, with a pooled odds ratio (POR) of 8.41 (95% CI 4.66-12.16).

conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a moderate utilization of obstetric ultrasound among pregnant mothers in Africa, with an increasing trend over time, particularly after 2020. The overall level of knowledge about obstetric ultrasound among mothers was 74.33%, and knowledge was identified as the key factor significantly associated with ultrasound utilization.

Indexed as

AfricaKnowledgeObstetric ultrasoundPregnant womenUtilization

Identifiers

PMID40029487
PMCPMC11876473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.