ArticlePlanta2025
Comparative transcriptomics of susceptible and resistant Cucumis metuliferus upon Meloidogyne incognita infection.
Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Integrated omics reveal phenylpropanoid biosynthesis as a key defense pathway against Meloidogyne incognita in Cucumis metuliferus.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionComparative transcriptomics has identified several candidate genes contributing to the resistance of Cucumis metuliferus against Meloidogyne incognita. The Southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) is a significant threat to Cucurbitaceae crops. The African horned melon (Cucumis metuliferus), a wild relative, exhibits high resistance to this nematode. To explore the resistance mechanism, phenotypic analyses were conducted on a susceptible inbred line (CM27) and a resistant inbred line (CM3). CM3 exhibited enhanced root biomass and significantly higher resistance compared to CM27, with poor nematode development observed in CM3 roots. Transcriptomic profiling at multiple post-infection time points revealed 2243 and 3700 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in CM3 and CM27, respectively. Among these, the top ten DEGs upregulated exclusively in CM3 were functionally analyzed using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). Silencing of EVM0019904 or EVM0017058 in CM3 led to susceptibility to M. incognita. These findings provide novel insights into the resistance mechanisms of M. incognita in C. metuliferus and offer potential resources for breeding nematode-resistant Cucurbitaceae crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40029419What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.