ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Anticipating complications in stereotactic brain biopsy: a predictive approach.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of diagnostic yield and surgical safety in stereotactic brain biopsy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Outpatient supratentorial craniotomy for brain lesions: a pilot feasibility and safety study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Diagnostic yield and safety of frame-based versus robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: a matched cohort analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance and safety of stereotactic frame-based biopsy for sub centimeter intracranial lesions: A matched cohort analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Timing of complications following stereotactic brain biopsy: implications for same-day discharge feasibility.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- From Anatomy to Genomics Using a Multi-Task Deep Learning Approach for Comprehensive Glioma Profiling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating hemorrhagic risks using intratumoral susceptibility signals in stereotactic brain biopsies.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic brain biopsy is a critical procedure in neurosurgery, particularly for the diagnosis of brain tumors and cryptogenic neurological diseases. Despite its safety profile, biopsy procedures carry a risk of complications. This study aimed to identify predictors of symptomatic complications in a large cohort and develop a risk prediction score. This retrospective single-center study examined data from 2,338 stereotactic brain biopsies performed over 15 years. The primary outcomes included complication rates, severity, timing, and management. Factors such as patient demographics, medical history, lesion characteristics, and biopsy procedures were analyzed. Predictive models were created using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select key variables with cross-validation and a random forest algorithm for further refinement. Owing to insufficient predictive performance for clinical use, we used variables selected by LASSO regression to construct an analytical multivariate model. Symptomatic complications occurred in 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-4.7) of cases, with 0.8% being fatal. Of the symptomatic complications, 46.2% occurred within the first hour following biopsy and 71.4% within two hours. Key predictive factors included biopsy repetition (odds ratio, 3.3; 95%CI [1.1-9.6], p = 0.050), advanced age (1.2 [1.02-1.4], p = 0.048), lesion location (brainstem (4.1 [1.6-10.4], p = 0.004), pineal region (16.2 [3.0-89.4], p = 0.001), deep brain (1.8 [1.1-2.9], p = 0.016)), and toxoplasmosis (4.9 [1.4-17.7], p = 0.038). The best predictive model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of only 0.64 and the random forest models had poorer discriminative accuracy (AUC < 0.6). Symptomatic complications following stereotactic brain biopsy are rare, but are associated with specific patient profiles. Although predictive modeling provided moderate accuracy, further refinement is necessary for reliable risk stratification. Awareness of high-risk patient characteristics and rigorous procedural planning are essential for minimizing complications. Future studies should explore advanced predictive methods and refine the risk assessment tools to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40029417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.