Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029417›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Anticipating complications in stereotactic brain biopsy: a predictive approach.

Alexandre Lavé, Henri Malaizé, Karima Mokhtari, Lucia Nichelli, Rémy Bernard, Bertrand Mathon, PSL Brain Biopsy Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandre LavéDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sorbonne University, APHP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, F- 75013, France.
Henri MalaizéDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sorbonne University, APHP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, F- 75013, France.
Karima MokhtariDepartment of Neuropathology, Sorbonne University, APHP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, IHU, ICM, Paris, F-75013, France.
Lucia NichelliDepartment of Neuroradiology, Sorbonne University, APHP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, F- 75013, France.
Rémy BernardDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sorbonne University, APHP, La Pitié- Salpêtrière, Paris, F-75013, France.
Bertrand MathonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sorbonne University, APHP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, F- 75013, France. bertrand.mathon@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9182-5846
PSL Brain Biopsy Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic brain biopsy is a critical procedure in neurosurgery, particularly for the diagnosis of brain tumors and cryptogenic neurological diseases. Despite its safety profile, biopsy procedures carry a risk of complications. This study aimed to identify predictors of symptomatic complications in a large cohort and develop a risk prediction score. This retrospective single-center study examined data from 2,338 stereotactic brain biopsies performed over 15 years. The primary outcomes included complication rates, severity, timing, and management. Factors such as patient demographics, medical history, lesion characteristics, and biopsy procedures were analyzed. Predictive models were created using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select key variables with cross-validation and a random forest algorithm for further refinement. Owing to insufficient predictive performance for clinical use, we used variables selected by LASSO regression to construct an analytical multivariate model. Symptomatic complications occurred in 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-4.7) of cases, with 0.8% being fatal. Of the symptomatic complications, 46.2% occurred within the first hour following biopsy and 71.4% within two hours. Key predictive factors included biopsy repetition (odds ratio, 3.3; 95%CI [1.1-9.6], p = 0.050), advanced age (1.2 [1.02-1.4], p = 0.048), lesion location (brainstem (4.1 [1.6-10.4], p = 0.004), pineal region (16.2 [3.0-89.4], p = 0.001), deep brain (1.8 [1.1-2.9], p = 0.016)), and toxoplasmosis (4.9 [1.4-17.7], p = 0.038). The best predictive model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of only 0.64 and the random forest models had poorer discriminative accuracy (AUC < 0.6). Symptomatic complications following stereotactic brain biopsy are rare, but are associated with specific patient profiles. Although predictive modeling provided moderate accuracy, further refinement is necessary for reliable risk stratification. Awareness of high-risk patient characteristics and rigorous procedural planning are essential for minimizing complications. Future studies should explore advanced predictive methods and refine the risk assessment tools to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

BrainBrain NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsStereotaxic TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBrain biopsyComplicationsDiagnosisMorbidityPredictive modelPredictorsSafety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.