Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029400›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[Patient-specific 3D-printed implants and templates for elbow and forearm].

Christopher Cramer, Samuel Sperlich, Annika Hättich, Tobias Dust, Karl-Heinz Frosch, Konrad Mader

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher CramerKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Sektion Hand‑, Unterarm- und Ellenbogentraumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. c.cramer@uke.de.
Samuel SperlichKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Sektion Hand‑, Unterarm- und Ellenbogentraumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Annika HättichKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Sektion Hand‑, Unterarm- und Ellenbogentraumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Tobias DustKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Sektion Hand‑, Unterarm- und Ellenbogentraumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Karl-Heinz FroschKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Sektion Hand‑, Unterarm- und Ellenbogentraumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Konrad MaderKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Sektion Hand‑, Unterarm- und Ellenbogentraumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of 3D printing has found its way into orthopedics and trauma surgery, particularly for complex interventions on the elbow and forearm. By producing patient-specific implants and surgical templates misalignments, fractures and deformities can be precisely corrected. It could be shown that this technology increases the surgical accuracy, shortens recovery times and reduces postoperative complications. Compared to conventional implants 3D-printed implants provide the advantage of individual adaptation to the anatomical situation of the patient. This is particularly relevant in complex cases, such as malunions, congenital malformations (e.g., Madelung's deformity) and tumor-related deformities. The preoperative planning with 3D models enables a detailed simulation of the procedure and optimizes the placement of the implants. Despite these advantages challenges still remain: the production of patient-specific implants is time-consuming and cost-intensive. In addition, the technology requires expertise and special resources, which limit its application in less specialized centers. Future developments, such as 4D printing with shape-changing implants, promise further progress. By combining precision, individualization and dynamic adaptability, 3D-printed implants could sustainably improve patient care in orthopedics and trauma surgery.

Indexed as

ElbowElbow JointForearmPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and ImplantsHumansProsthesis DesignComputer-aided designCongenital deformitiesCorrective osteotomyMalunited fractureTumor-related deformities

Identifiers

PMID40029400
PMCPMC12041000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.