ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Volume Restoration of the Labia Majora: ESOLANE study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Labia Majora Atrophy in the Chinese Population.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Performance and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Gynaecological Filler for Labia Majora Augmentation: A Randomised Controlled Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Good Short- and Mid-term Outcome After Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Infiltration for Hallux Rigidus: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisLabia majora atrophy and protrusion of the labia minora beyond the labia majora is a concern for an increasing number of women who consider it aesthetically and, sometimes, functionally unsatisfactory. The ESOLANE study was a multicenter clinical investigation designed to collect effectiveness and safety data on DESIRIAL® PLUS injected subcutaneously in the labia majora in participants seeking labia majora volume deficits correction.
methodsA prospective, uncontrolled, open-label multicenter study was conducted between November 2019 and December 2021. Seventy-three women with labia majora hypotrophy or atrophy and requesting labia majora volume restoration were enrolled and 72 were treated. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, then 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks post treatment. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients' who reported aesthetic improvement on the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) 12 weeks after initial injection. Secondary endpoints were assessments of patients' and investigators' who reported GAIS, patient sexual function and physical symptoms, patient satisfaction, and safety.
resultsAccording to the patients' who reported GAIS, 97% rated themselves as improved 12 weeks following the initial treatment. Improvement levels were high throughout the 52-week follow-up period with rates > 92%. Improvements were also confirmed on investigators' assessments with rates > 86%. Furthermore, patients reported significantly improved sexual function, symptom reduction, and high satisfaction. DESIRIAL® PLUS was well tolerated.
conclusionsDESIRIAL® PLUS is an effective and safe treatment option in patients with labia majora hypotrophy or atrophy. This effect goes beyond aesthetic improvement, as treatment was associated with improvement in patients' physical symptoms and sexual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.