Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029351›Full record

Observational studyStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

Tumor volume change at radiation boost planning to estimate the response to chemoradiotherapy in stage III unresectable NSCLC (TORCH): a multicenter retrospective observational study.

Simon Trommer, Jörg Andreas Müller, Michael Oertel, Felix Ehret, Siyer Roohani, Hai Minh Ha, Quynh Ngo Ha, Kathrin Hering, Franziska Nägler, Tim Lange and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Simon TrommerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. simon.trommer@uk-halle.de.
Jörg Andreas MüllerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. joerg-andreas.mueller@uk-halle.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0843-7373
Michael OertelClinic for Radiotherapy-Radiooncology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Felix EhretClinic for Radiooncology and Radiation Therapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Siyer RoohaniClinic for Radiooncology and Radiation Therapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hai Minh HaUniversity Clinic for Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Magdeburg A. ö. R, Magdeburg, Germany.
Quynh Ngo HaUniversity Clinic for Radiation Therapy, University Hospital Magdeburg A. ö. R, Magdeburg, Germany.
Kathrin HeringDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Franziska NäglerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tim LangeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Germany.
Matthias MäurerDepartment for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Thomas WeissmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian PutzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Maike TrommerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str, 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christian BauesDepartment of Radiooncology, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Sophie DobiaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy at the Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maria WaltenbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy at the Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tomas SkripcakGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk VordermarkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Daniel MedenwaldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in UICC stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can be increased with consolidating immunotherapy. Recent studies have shown a strong predictive value of gross tumor volume (GTV) changes during CRT on OS. The TORCH trial investigated the prognostic impact of GTV changes during CRT as a predictor for a response to immunotherapy.

methodsThis retrospective non-interventional observational multicenter trial included n = 203 patients from 10 German university centers for radiation oncology with confirmed inoperable NSCLC in UICC stage III A-C. Patients had received CRT between 2015 and 2023 as a curative-intent treatment approach. Patient and tumor characteristics were collected anonymously via electronic case report forms. Initial GTVs before CRT (initial planning CT, GTV1) and at 40-50 Gy (re-planning CT for radiation boost, GTV2) were delineated. Absolute and relative GTV changes before/during CRT were correlated with OS to predict the response to CRT with sequential immunotherapy. Hazard ratios (HR) of survival analyses were estimated using adjusted Cox regression models.

resultsThe mean GTV1 before radiation therapy (RT) was 145.29 ml with the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles being 61.36 ml, 145.29 ml, and 204.93 ml, respectively. Before initiation of the radiation boost, the mean GTV2 was 99.58 ml, with the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles at 32.93 ml, 70.45 ml, and 126.85 ml. The HR for the impact of GTV1 on survival was 0.99 per ml (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.00; p = 0.49). For the absolute volume change between GTV1 and GTV2, the HR was 1.004 per ml (95% CI 0.997-1.011; p = 0.26). In a subgroup analysis of patients who were treated with durvalumab, absolute volume changes between GTV1 and GTV2 were associated with longer OS (HR = 0.955 per ml; 95% CI 0.916-0.996; p = 0.03). Overall, durvalumab treatment was positively associated with OS, demonstrating an HR of 0.454 (95% CI 0.209-0.990; p = 0.047).

conclusionPretreatment GTV and absolute GTV volume changes did not significantly correlate with OS. However, the absolute volume change between the pretreatment and replanning GTV was associated with longer OS in patients treated with durvalumab. Histological subtype, grading, UICC stage, age at onset, pulmonary comorbidities, and smoking status had no significant association with OS. Durvalumab treatment was associated with improved OS.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyLung NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTumor BurdenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisDurvalumabGross tumor volumeImmunotherapyNon-small cell lung cancerStage III lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID40029351
PMCPMC12488809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.