ArticleActa orthopaedica2025
Patient-reported outcome 1 to 4 years after periprosthetic knee fracture: a nationwide cross-sectional matched study.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Cartilage Repair in Osteoarthritis Using Platelet Lysates and Arthroscopic Microfracture.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposePeriprosthetic knee fractures (PPKFs) can be a serious complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores reported between 1 and 4 years after PPKF with a matched uncomplicated TKA control group.
methodsThis nationwide cross-sectional matched cohort study included 372 TKA patients with a PPKF occurring from 2019 to 2022 and a control group of 878 uncomplicated TKA patients matched by age, time since TKA, and sex. The study population was derived from the Danish National Patient Register. The patients received questionnaires regarding knee function, quality of life, pain and satisfaction in 2023. The questionnaires included Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the EQ-5D-5L Index.
resultsThe response rate was 48%. Mean OKS was 7 (confidence interval [CI] 5-9) points lower after a PPKF with a score of 30 (standard deviation [SD] 11) in the PPKF group vs 37 (SD 11) in the control group. The FJS was 13 (CI 7-19) points lower after a PPKF with a score of 50 (SD 30) in the PPKF group vs 63 (SD 30) in the control group. Mean EQ-5D-5L Index scores were 0.17 (CI 0.12-0.22) lower after a PPKF with a score of 0.68 (SD 0.25) in the PPKF group vs 0.85 (SD 0.25) in the control group. Additional analysis of patients who completed PROMs 1-2 years compared with 3-4 years after PPKF showed better PRO scores after 3-4 years with an OKS of 32 (SD 12) vs 27 (SD 12), FJS 55 (SD 32) vs 43 (SD 32), and EQ-5D-5L Index of 0.74 (SD 0.34) vs 0.60 (SD 0.34).
conclusionFollowing PPKF, patients reported worse knee function, more pain, lower satisfaction, and poorer quality of life than those with uncomplicated TKAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.