ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Direct thin-layer agar for bedaquiline-susceptibility testing of
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated thin-layer agar (TLA) as a faster alternative for both indirect minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination of bedaquiline (BDQ) from culture isolates and direct drug-susceptibility testing (DST) from sputum samples. Indirect BDQ-MIC results from TLA were compared to the established 7H11 solid DST. Direct-TLA-DST performance was assessed using 143 baseline sputum samples from rifampicin-resistant TB cases. Direct-TLA tested susceptibility to rifampicin, isoniazid, levofloxacin, and BDQ, with results compared to Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) and MGIT. For indirect BDQ-MIC determination, TLA accurately identified H37Rv MICs within the WHO control range (0.015-0.12μg/mL). Optimal results were obtained with standard incubation and day 7 reading of the plates. TLA correctly classified all wild-type clinical strains as BDQ-susceptible and detected 9 out of 10 BDQ-resistant strains with elevated MICs. Direct-TLA-DST detected MTB in 53.8% of samples, compared to 55.9% on LJ and 69.4% in MGIT. Uninterpretable results due to contamination or medium drying were low (4.9%). The median time to result was 15 days for smear-positive and 22 days for smear-negative samples, faster than WHO-endorsed methods. Sensitivity was 100% for rifampicin and 87.8% for isoniazid, with a specificity of 100% for all drugs except isoniazid (96.2%). No BDQ nor levofloxacin resistance was detected, thus direct TLA sensitivity could not be assessed. In conclusion, direct-TLA-DST offers a reliable and faster alternative to conventional DST methods for BDQ and other anti-TB drugs. Essentially, this technique can be operated at BioSafety Level 2, allowing decentralization of pDST for managing drug-resistant TB in settings with limited laboratory infrastructure. IMPORTANCE: This paper addresses the critical need for faster direct drug-susceptibility testing (DST) on sputum, especially for bedaquiline (BDQ), which is a key drug in treating drug-resistant TB. Currently, there is a lack of rapid, reliable methods for direct BDQ testing from sputum samples, limiting timely and accurate treatment decisions and monitoring. By demonstrating the potential of thin-layer agar (TLA) for direct BDQ-MIC determination, this study offers a promising solution that could significantly improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.