Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40029045›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Ethograms predict visual fear conditioning status in rats.

David C Williams, Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon, Aleah M DuBois, Suhui Qian, Genevieve Valvo, Selena Shen, Jacob B Boyce, Anaise C Fitzpatrick, Mahsa Moaddab and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

David C WilliamsBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Amanda ChuBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Nicholas T GordonBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Aleah M DuBoisBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Suhui QianBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Genevieve ValvoBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Selena ShenBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Jacob B BoyceBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Anaise C FitzpatrickBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Mahsa MoaddabBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Emma L RussellBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Liliuokalani H CounsmanBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Michael A McDannaldBoston College Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Chestnut Hill, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8525-1260

Funding

Early life stress, neuron-type function and a raphe-amygdala circuit for threat estimationR01MH117791 · NIMH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI MCDANNALD, MICHAEL A · 2018 to 2025
$4.0M
NIH HHS R01-MH117791NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors - in a short and simple procedure - containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalFearAnimalsCuesFemaleLocomotionMaleRatsRats, Long-Evansassociativeethogramfearflightfreezinglocomotionneurosciencerat

Identifiers

PMID40029045
PMCPMC11957538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.