ReviewJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
Safety of Indocyanine Green Microdosing for Clinical Imaging of CSF Ventricular Dynamics and Extracranial Outflow.
Review in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeIntravenous administration of indocyanine green (ICG) has been approved in brain surgeries for decades, yet concerns about neurotoxicity prevent its direct administration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Armed with prior animal studies demonstrating the feasibility of using ICG microdosing into the CSF, we sought to evaluate its nonclinical safety profile and obtain surrogate measures in adults prior to its use in human neonates.
methodsEvaluation of ICG toxicity was conducted in mixed primary CNS cell cultures and in an extended safety study of juvenile rat pups deploying intraventricular injections of saline (as control) or ICG. Analysis of animal behavior included Novel Object Place Recognition Test and rotarod behavioral tests. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid damage, microglial activation, and neuronal density was performed on collected brains. We measured ICG levels (before and after intravenous administration) in collected CSF from external ventricular drain catheters of 10 brain-injured adults.
resultsTNF-α and lactate dehydrogenase assay for cytotoxicity showed transient elevations after 1 h of incubation with 1291 µM ICG, but none at or below 322 µM ICG, even after 24 h of incubation. Behavioral tests and immunohistochemical analyses showed no differences between ICG-administered animals and controls. Intraventricular concentrations of ICG in collected human CSF ranged between 0.17 and 7.93 µM, with no adverse events associated with intravenous administration.
conclusionsWith intraventricular microdosing of 100 µg ICG, maximal ICG concentrations in neonatal CSF range from 1.3 to 6 5 µM. CNS cell culture, rat safety studies, and surrogate measures in adults evidence the safety of microdosing ICG directly into the CSF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.