Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028818›Full record

SynthesisBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2025

Do Antenatal Interventions Improve Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes for Migrant Women Living in High-Income Countries and What Guidelines Exist for Migrant Women? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sharon Weerasingha, Kirstin Tindal, Kirsten Palmer, Stacey J Ellery, Miranda Davies-Tuck

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon WeerasinghaThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-0060-8421
Kirstin TindalThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Kirsten PalmerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Stacey J ElleryThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.
Miranda Davies-TuckThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) ScholarshipMonash Graduate Excellence ScholarshipNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the rise in migrant women giving birth in high-income countries (HICs) there is a need to identify and evaluate the efficacy of existing interventions that address disparities in adverse pregnancy outcomes experienced by migrant women.

objectiveThis review aims to identify any antenatal interventions offered to migrant women living in HICs, evaluate their efficacy at improving perinatal and maternal adverse outcomes, and to identify and evaluate pregnancy management guidelines relating to migrant status or ethnicity-specific practices or recommendations. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, TRIP, ProQuest, and the International Guidelines Library were searched from January 2010 to March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: English-language randomized controlled trials, mixed-methods, and observational studies reporting perinatal and maternal outcomes in women living in HICs receiving a migrant-specific antenatal intervention. An additional search of any pregnancy management guidelines relating to migrant status or ethnicity-specific practices or recommendations was completed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently conducted data extraction. Outcomes of interest included perinatal (stillbirth, neonatal death, 5-min post-delivery Apgar score < 7, NICU admission, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, low birth weight, and preterm birth) and maternal outcomes (mortality, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, caesarean birth, instrumental birth, and induction of labour). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and pooled for meta-analysis using a random-effects model. All studies and guidelines were assessed using relevant risk assessment tools. MAIN

resultsSix studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Meta-analysis showed that infants born to women offered a migrant-specific antenatal intervention had lower odds of stillbirth (OR 0.60 95% CI 0.37-0.97, p = 0.04, I

conclusionSeveral migrant-specific antenatal interventions exist for migrant women living in HICs. These include fetal monitoring, group antenatal care programs, and a cultural training program for midwives. Despite heterogeneity between interventions, together they reduced the odds of stillbirth. Of the pregnancy management guidelines identified, most recommendations were largely based on findings from systematic reviews of observational and cohort studies, highlighting the lack of higher-quality evidence from clinical trials currently available.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareTransients and MigrantsDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyantenatal careantenatal interventionshigh‐income countriesmaternity caremigrant and refugee women

Identifiers

PMID40028818
PMCPMC12612383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.