Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028783›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2025

Abuse and Disrespect in Obstetric Care in the United States: A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Nurse Experiences.

Umber Darilek, Sara L Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umber DarilekDepartment of Undergraduate Nursing, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3446-2890
Sara L GillSchool of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-7518

Funding

Lillie Cranz Cullen Professorship in Nursing EndowmentMcFarlane Charitable TrustWilliam and Rita Head Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis qualitative descriptive study of the experiences of US labor and delivery nurses follows the World Health Organization's call to address abuse and disrespect of women in maternity care. The majority of research about abuse and disrespect for childbearing women has been conducted in Africa, Asia, and Europe, but the US is unique as a high-income country with largely capitalist or privatized health care. The objective of this study was to gain knowledge about abuse and disrespect in hospital-based maternity care in the US from the perspective of labor and delivery nurses.

methodsUsing a qualitative descriptive methodology, online data collection followed by optional interviews, we solicited the experiences of labor and delivery nurses regarding their experiences with patients being treated unethically in obstetric care. Content analysis was used to interpret the data into themes.

resultsOne hundred sixty-eight (N = 168) participants provided written examples of unethical treatment they had witnessed in their professional experience, and 7 interviews were conducted. Four major themes were identified: Violation of the Trust that We are Going to Keep You and Your Baby Safe; Assault; Stripping a Patient of Autonomy; and Failure of the Hospital to Provide Safe Conditions for Birth. DISCUSSION: People within the healthcare system are aware of abuse and disrespect, but it is often hidden by stakeholders who have conflicting interests. Perpetrators of abuse and disrespect are people and systems. More research is necessary to quantify and address the problems from within the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMaternal Health ServicesNurse-Patient RelationsObstetric NursingAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPregnancyQualitative ResearchRespectTrustUnited Statesabuse & disrespectchildbirthobstetric violencequalitative researchrespectful maternity carewomen's health

Identifiers

PMID40028783
PMCPMC12612357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.