Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028702›Full record

ReviewRegenerative medicine

Beyond transplants: current and future therapeutic potential of amniotic membrane extract (AME) in ophthalmology.

Ilayda Korkmaz, Mehmet Gurdal, Mesut Arici, Ozlem Barut Selver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regenerative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilayda KorkmazBandirma Training and Research Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Balikesir, Turkey.
Mehmet GurdalFaculty of Medicine, Ocular Surface Research Laboratory, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Mesut AriciFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ozlem Barut SelverFaculty of Medicine, Ocular Surface Research Laboratory, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3333-3349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no established consensus or standardized method for the preparation of amniotic membrane extract (AME). Consequently, various preparation, preservation, and sterilization techniques have been employed. To obtain AME rich in bioactive components with high therapeutic efficacy, each step of the preparation process is of critical importance. The appropriate procurement of the amniotic membrane minimizes the risk of infection transmission and reduces inter- and intra-donor variability. For the subsequent extraction process, different approaches are utilized due to factors such as laboratory infrastructure variability and the lack of a standardized method. Although lyophilization has recently emerged as a prominent method for the long-term preservation of AME, further investigation is required to assess its impact on the biochemical composition and clinical efficacy of the membrane. In ophthalmology,

Indexed as

AmnionOphthalmologyTissue ExtractsAnimalsHumansTissue ExtractsAmniotic membrane extractamniotic membrane extract eye dropamniotic membrane extract preparationgamma sterilizationlyophilization

Identifiers

PMID40028702
PMCPMC11951707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.