ArticleHeliyon2025
Finding the best column for polar basic analytes across reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of RP-HPLC Method forACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The chromatographic measurement of polar molecules is often surprisingly complicated. On the one hand, the standard experiments use C18 columns, which is usually unsuitable. On the other hand, these types of molecules can behave vastly differently despite their similarities. Thus, finding the right chromatographic conditions is challenging. HILIC can be an obvious choice, but C18 is still used with suitable analytes. Comparing the two methods would be advantageous, but a numerical comparison can be problematic. Thus, a simple comparing and ranking system is needed and put to use to find the best method for the separation of polar basic molecules. Results: In this paper, nine columns with different stationary phases, from reversed-phase to hydrophilic interaction, are compared and ranked in gradient elution. The effect of pH was also considered. The measurements were repeated in acidic, near-to-neutral, and basic conditions. A straightforward system is developed to rank different stationary phases. Its foundation was peak shapes and resolutions. Every measurement condition with all the columns on the available pHs is evaluated by each property. The testing solution consisted of ten components, which aimed to cover a wide range of polar basic molecules. The comparison also focuses on these analytes. We highlighted which analyte is adaptable to different methods or which needed exclusive conditions. The resulting best column with the optimal conditions is presented and proven highly efficient for their separation. Significance: A straightforward comparison and ranking system is developed to test multiple chromatographic columns with different stationary phases, from reversed-phase to hydrophilic interaction in gradient elution, seeking the best method for separating polar basic molecules. Nine columns were compared in multiple conditions. The best setup resulting in the competition is presented in detail, which can be applied to a wide range of analytes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.