ArticleHeliyon2025
Efficacy of high fidelity pediatric simulation on nursing students' self-awareness and empathy in a Middle Eastern County.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Mind Mapping with Virtual Simulation: A Cognitive Scaffolding for Clinical Reasoning in Residency.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The importance of nurses' self-awareness and empathy and the effect of high-fidelity simulation in cultivating self-awareness and empathy among students is yet to be explored. Methods: This study determined the efficacy of high-fidelity simulation on self-awareness and empathy among undergraduate nursing students. A quasi-experimental approach with a one-group pre-posttest design was employed. Self-awareness was assessed using Self-Consciousness Revised Scale (22 items), while empathy was measured with the Kiersmae Chen Empathy Scale (15 items). Results: Data from 67 participants were analyzed. Analysis revealed no significant difference in students' self-awareness (t = -0.01, p > 0.05) or empathy (t = -1.92, p > 0.05) pre- and post-high-fidelity simulation. However, there was a notable improvement in cognitive empathy scores. To compare High-fidelity simulation and self-awareness, a one-way ANCOVA was conducted, controlling for gender, GPA, and previous exposure to simulation. The results indicated a non-significant relationship (F (1) = 3.59, p > 0.05). Likewise, High-fidelity simulation and empathy was compared using one-way ANCOVA while controlling for gender, GPA, and previous simulation exposure. The results revealed a non-significant relationship (F(1) = 1.64, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Though the study findings did not demonstrate significant effects, the observed enhancement in cognitive empathy post-simulation suggests a potential benefit. It is plausible that the intervention dosage was insufficient to induce substantial changes in these skills. Therefore, it is recommended to replicate the study with a larger sample and multiple simulation sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.