Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028529›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2025

Culinary and medicinal wonders of the wild: An ethnobotanical review of native herbs and spices in Thailand.

Angkhana Inta, Prateep Panyadee, Ratchuporn Suksathan, Wittaya Pongamornkul, Kittiyut Punchay, Terd Disayathanoowat, Natcha Chaisoung, Thirawut Phichonsatcha, Katesarin Maneenoon, Lixin Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angkhana IntaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Prateep PanyadeeQueen Sirikit Botanic Garden (QSBG), The Botanical Garden Organisation, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Ratchuporn SuksathanQueen Sirikit Botanic Garden (QSBG), The Botanical Garden Organisation, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Wittaya PongamornkulQueen Sirikit Botanic Garden (QSBG), The Botanical Garden Organisation, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kittiyut PunchayQueen Sirikit Botanic Garden (QSBG), The Botanical Garden Organisation, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Terd DisayathanoowatDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Natcha ChaisoungDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thirawut PhichonsatchaGrand Chemical Far East Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand.
Katesarin ManeenoonFaculty of Traditional Thai Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Lixin YangKey Laboratory of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This ethnobotanical review explores the culinary and medicinal uses of wild herbs and spices in Thailand, with an emphasis on documenting traditional knowledge and their ethnomedicinal uses. Analyzing 76 ethnobotanical studies, we identified 248 use reports encompassing 46 species, 10 families, and 26 genera, predominantly focusing on the flora of northern Thailand. The most frequently utilized wild herbs and spices include

Indexed as

Aromatic plantsEthnobotanyHerbsMedicinal plantsTraditional knowledge

Identifiers

PMID40028529
PMCPMC11872421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.