ArticleHeliyon2025
The special algorithm based on RSA cryptography for signing and verifying digital signature.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This aim of this research is to present the improved equations to enhance RSA cryptography for signing and verifying processes. The primary benefit is in signing procedure, where it could decrease computing resources by introducing a new integer to be utilized as exponents instead of the private key. In fact, this integer is always smaller than the private key. However, authenticating the digital signature will require additional processing resources. The result obtained from validating the signature with the original equation must be multiplied by a single integer. However, while evaluating the entire process of signing and validating digital signatures, the proposed method presents a chance to significantly reduce the computing resources. Furthermore, two new techniques for generating all necessary parameters are introduced, Algorithm 3.1 and Algorithm 3.2. Although the long duration of these procedures is required, they will be executed only once. The experimental results demonstrate that Algorithm 3.2, which has a longer execution time than Algorithm 3.1, demands an average period of 70 s to generate a 1024-bit modulus and all associated parameters. Furthermore, the experimental results on the process of signing digital signatures indicate that the proposed method may reduce the average time about 30 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.