Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028526›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

The special algorithm based on RSA cryptography for signing and verifying digital signature.

Kritsanapong Somsuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kritsanapong SomsukDepartment of Computer and Communication Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Udon Thani Rajabhat University, UDRU, Udon Thani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This aim of this research is to present the improved equations to enhance RSA cryptography for signing and verifying processes. The primary benefit is in signing procedure, where it could decrease computing resources by introducing a new integer to be utilized as exponents instead of the private key. In fact, this integer is always smaller than the private key. However, authenticating the digital signature will require additional processing resources. The result obtained from validating the signature with the original equation must be multiplied by a single integer. However, while evaluating the entire process of signing and validating digital signatures, the proposed method presents a chance to significantly reduce the computing resources. Furthermore, two new techniques for generating all necessary parameters are introduced, Algorithm 3.1 and Algorithm 3.2. Although the long duration of these procedures is required, they will be executed only once. The experimental results demonstrate that Algorithm 3.2, which has a longer execution time than Algorithm 3.1, demands an average period of 70 s to generate a 1024-bit modulus and all associated parameters. Furthermore, the experimental results on the process of signing digital signatures indicate that the proposed method may reduce the average time about 30 %.

Indexed as

Digital signatureModular multiplicationModular squareRSASigning processVerifying process

Identifiers

PMID40028526
PMCPMC11870183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.