ArticleDental research journal2025
The effect of remineralization pretreatments on the enamel bond strength of demineralized and sound enamel: An
Article in Dental research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of immediate and delayed composite restoration on shear bond strength to remineralized initial enamel lesions: an in vitro study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During tooth preparation, the clinician may face a hard remineralized enamel surrounding the cavity with unknown effects on the enamel bond strength. This study aims to assess the effect of remineralizing pretreatments with casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) or CPP-amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate (CPP-ACFP) on the bond strength of composite resin and sound or demineralized enamel. Materials and Methods: This study employed an Results: The sound (S) groups (33.81 ± 8.48) showed a significantly higher bond strength than the lesion (L) groups (25.77 ± 6.69). Among the pretreatments, CPP-ACFP-pretreated groups had the highest bond strength (33.86 ± 8.87). Pairwise comparisons showed significant differences between CPP-ACFP-treated demineralized enamel and control demineralized enamel in both bonding systems ( Conclusion: Pretreatment of demineralized enamel with CPP-ACFP before using total-etch and self-etch systems results in a bond strength comparable to that of sound enamel, making it clinically acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.