Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028485›Full record

ReviewThe journal of liquid biopsy2023

Eleonora Nicolò, Mara Serena Serafini, Laura Munoz-Arcos, Letizia Pontolillo, Elisabetta Molteni, Nadia Bayou, Eleni Andreopoulou, Giuseppe Curigliano, Carolina Reduzzi, Massimo Cristofanilli

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Development ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Circulating tumor cellsTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eleonora NicolòDivision of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mara Serena SerafiniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Laura Munoz-ArcosDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Letizia PontolilloDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Elisabetta MolteniDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Nadia BayouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Eleni AndreopoulouDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDivision of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carolina ReduzziDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Massimo CristofanilliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) plays a central role in breast cancer (BC). Therefore, it is critical to develop a method that can capture its spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Nowadays, therapeutic decisions for BC patients relies on evaluation of HER2 status from tissue biopsies using immunohistochemistry and

Indexed as

Breast cancerCirculating tumor cellsHER2HER2-LowPredictive valuePrognostic value

Identifiers

PMID40028485
PMCPMC11863949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.