Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028436›Full record

ArticleSocial and personality psychology compass2024

Revisiting the Charmed Circle: A Reflexive Examination of Unanswered Questions in the Infidelity Literature.

Dana A Weiser, M Rosie Shrout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social and personality psychology compass, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dana A WeiserDepartment of Human Development and Family Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7478-4811
M Rosie ShroutDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5751-1782

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at Indiana UniversityK12TR004415 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAMIR KUMAR GUPTA · 2023 to 2026
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infidelity is a common experience in romantic relationships, and as such, relationships researchers have amassed a large infidelity literature. In the current manuscript, we provide a brief overview of the infidelity literature, specifically focusing on how infidelity is defined, infidelity attitudes, predictors of infidelity, and infidelity outcomes. Next, we introduce readers to the "Charmed Circle" (Rubin, 1984), a theoretical perspective that conceptualizes monogamous sex as part of society's view of "good, normal, and natural" sex, otherwise known as mononormativity. As scholars, we are equally socialized in a system that endorses and reinforces mononormativity. In this article, we call on scholars to engage in reflexivity and consider how mononormativity has shaped the infidelity literature and their approach to research. We highlight pressing questions within the infidelity literature and argue that by questioning our own biases, assumptions, and methodologies, we will be able to further advance our understanding of infidelity.

Indexed as

consensual non-monogamyExtradyadicfeminist theoryinfidelitymonogamismmononormativitynon-monogamy

Identifiers

PMID40028436
PMCPMC11870391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.