ReviewCureus2025
Comparative Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Reducing Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Esketamine on Postoperative Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Single-Center Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Adropin Expression in Unilateral Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Prospective Active Controlled Randomized Trial Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative pain management is a critical component of patient care following surgical procedures. Opioid analgesics, particularly Remifentanil, have been traditionally used to manage pain, but these drugs come with significant risks, including opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) and the potential for dependence on opioids. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist, is a promising non-opioid alternative. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in reducing postoperative pain and opioid use, as well as to evaluate their safety profiles. A systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, utilizing PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. The findings revealed that both agents provided effective intraoperative analgesia. However, Dexmedetomidine consistently outperformed Remifentanil in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Additionally, Dexmedetomidine was associated with lower pain scores in the immediate postoperative period, particularly in spinal and gynecological surgeries. Despite its advantages in pain control and opioid-sparing effects, Dexmedetomidine was associated with slower recovery times, such as delayed eye-opening and longer extubation periods. In contrast, Remifentanil, with its rapid onset and offset, facilitated quicker recovery but resulted in increased postoperative opioid requirements and a higher incidence of OIH. Dexmedetomidine's side effects include bradycardia and hypotension, which were generally manageable and less severe than those associated with Remifentanil. Dexmedetomidine represents a promising alternative to Remifentanil for postoperative pain management. Its ability to reduce opioid consumption and mitigate the risk of OIH makes it an attractive option, particularly in patients at risk for opioid misuse or dependency. Nevertheless, further large-scale studies with diverse patient populations are needed to confirm these findings and refine the optimal dosing regimens for Dexmedetomidine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.