Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028430›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Comparative Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Reducing Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use: A Systematic Review.

Abbas Al-Hassan, Brandon Weissman, Shafayath Chowdhury, John Sawires, Varun Soti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abbas Al-HassanAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.
Brandon WeissmanInternal Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.
Shafayath ChowdhuryInternal Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.
John SawiresAnesthesiology and Critical Care, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.
Varun SotiPharmacology and Therapeutics, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pain management is a critical component of patient care following surgical procedures. Opioid analgesics, particularly Remifentanil, have been traditionally used to manage pain, but these drugs come with significant risks, including opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) and the potential for dependence on opioids. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonist, is a promising non-opioid alternative. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in reducing postoperative pain and opioid use, as well as to evaluate their safety profiles. A systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, utilizing PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. The findings revealed that both agents provided effective intraoperative analgesia. However, Dexmedetomidine consistently outperformed Remifentanil in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Additionally, Dexmedetomidine was associated with lower pain scores in the immediate postoperative period, particularly in spinal and gynecological surgeries. Despite its advantages in pain control and opioid-sparing effects, Dexmedetomidine was associated with slower recovery times, such as delayed eye-opening and longer extubation periods. In contrast, Remifentanil, with its rapid onset and offset, facilitated quicker recovery but resulted in increased postoperative opioid requirements and a higher incidence of OIH. Dexmedetomidine's side effects include bradycardia and hypotension, which were generally manageable and less severe than those associated with Remifentanil. Dexmedetomidine represents a promising alternative to Remifentanil for postoperative pain management. Its ability to reduce opioid consumption and mitigate the risk of OIH makes it an attractive option, particularly in patients at risk for opioid misuse or dependency. Nevertheless, further large-scale studies with diverse patient populations are needed to confirm these findings and refine the optimal dosing regimens for Dexmedetomidine.

Indexed as

dexmedetomidineefficacyopiate-free analgesiaopioid-induced hyperalgesiaremifentanil

Identifiers

PMID40028430
PMCPMC11870770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.