ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2024
Sensitivity and specificity assessment of four clinical tests for palmaris longus muscle by ultrasound.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four clinical tests confirmed by ultrasonography (USG) and to evaluate the role of age, sex, handedness, subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT), tendon thickness (TT), and STT/TT in determining the absence of the palmaris longus muscle. Patients and methods: In this descriptive study, 282 wrists of 141 healthy individuals (71 females, 70 males; mean age: 29±9.6 years; range, 21 to 55 years) were included between September 2021 and November 2022. The palmaris longus muscle tendon was identified by Schaeffer's test, Mishra's test I, Thompson's test, and Pushpakumar's test and then evaluated with USG. Before the tests, age, sex, and dominant hand information of the individuals were obtained. The STT and TT were measured with USG. Results: Sensitivity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 92%/73%, Mishra's I 91%/93%, Thompson's 84%/87%, and Pushpakumar's 86%/91%. Specificity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 87%/95%, Mishra's I 78%/82%, Thompson's 78%/79%, and Pushpakumar's 84%/82%. Sensitivity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 81%/96%, Mishra's I 92%/94%, Thompson's 85%/90%, and Pushpakumar's 91%/92%. Specificity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 68%/90%, Mishra's I 72%/90%, Thompson's 72%/85%, and Pushpakumar's 78%/85%. The intraclass correlation coefficient between clinical tests and USG was 0.94 for the left side and 0.95 for the right side. Conclusion: Mishra's test I and Pushpakumar's test can be used in females, while Schaeffer's test and Mishra's test I can be used in males as a mutually supportive clinical test. Furthermore, while there may be false negative and false positive test results due to muscle variations, it should be noted that STT/TT is also effective, particularly on the right side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.