Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028409›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2024

Sensitivity and specificity assessment of four clinical tests for palmaris longus muscle by ultrasound.

Zennure Adıgüzel Şahin, Mehmet Üzel, Fatma Güler Kahraman Yıldırım, Mahmut Ercan Tanyeli, Ahmet Ertaş, Deniz Palamar, Tuğçe Özekli Mısırlıoğlu, Kenan Akgün, Ahmet Dirican

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zennure Adıgüzel ŞahinDepartment of Anatomy, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4878-9587
Mehmet ÜzelDepartment of Anatomy, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7184-4900
Fatma Güler Kahraman YıldırımDepartment of Anatomy, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2384-2107
Mahmut Ercan TanyeliDepartment of Anatomy, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8280-1749
Ahmet ErtaşDepartment of Anatomy, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5518-4834
Deniz PalamarDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2882-2578
Tuğçe Özekli MısırlıoğluDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-5907
Kenan AkgünDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-1473
Ahmet DiricanDepartment of Biostatistics, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8454-4547

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four clinical tests confirmed by ultrasonography (USG) and to evaluate the role of age, sex, handedness, subcutaneous tissue thickness (STT), tendon thickness (TT), and STT/TT in determining the absence of the palmaris longus muscle. Patients and methods: In this descriptive study, 282 wrists of 141 healthy individuals (71 females, 70 males; mean age: 29±9.6 years; range, 21 to 55 years) were included between September 2021 and November 2022. The palmaris longus muscle tendon was identified by Schaeffer's test, Mishra's test I, Thompson's test, and Pushpakumar's test and then evaluated with USG. Before the tests, age, sex, and dominant hand information of the individuals were obtained. The STT and TT were measured with USG. Results: Sensitivity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 92%/73%, Mishra's I 91%/93%, Thompson's 84%/87%, and Pushpakumar's 86%/91%. Specificity values by side were as follows (right/left respectively): Schaeffer's 87%/95%, Mishra's I 78%/82%, Thompson's 78%/79%, and Pushpakumar's 84%/82%. Sensitivity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 81%/96%, Mishra's I 92%/94%, Thompson's 85%/90%, and Pushpakumar's 91%/92%. Specificity values by sex were as follows (female/male respectively): Schaeffer's 68%/90%, Mishra's I 72%/90%, Thompson's 72%/85%, and Pushpakumar's 78%/85%. The intraclass correlation coefficient between clinical tests and USG was 0.94 for the left side and 0.95 for the right side. Conclusion: Mishra's test I and Pushpakumar's test can be used in females, while Schaeffer's test and Mishra's test I can be used in males as a mutually supportive clinical test. Furthermore, while there may be false negative and false positive test results due to muscle variations, it should be noted that STT/TT is also effective, particularly on the right side.

Indexed as

Mishra IPalmaris longus musclePushpakumarSchaefferThompsonultrasonography.

Identifiers

PMID40028409
PMCPMC11868856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.