ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Presence of brain metastasis differentially impacts long-term survival after first-line therapy in melanoma depending on BRAF mutation status.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative Dermoscopic Analysis of Melanoma In Situ Versus Thin Invasive Melanoma Considering BRAF Mutational Status.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Modern therapeutic strategies have significantly improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma patients. Predictive factors of therapy response include serum LDH; however, predictive markers for long-term survival are currently largely lacking. Patients and methods: Patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma (AJCCv8) of cutaneous origin or unknown primary were identified from the prospective multicenter German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG) skin cancer registry ADOREG. Baseline characteristics were compared between patient groups with short-term versus long-term survival. Statistical analysis included ROC analysis and multinomial regression analysis. Results: Of 3066 stage IV melanoma patients entered into the ADOREG between 05/2014 and 06/2021, 395 were identified for this study, of whom 301 (76.2%) survived ≤1 year, and 94 (23.8%) survived ≥5 years after stage IV diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 6 months (range 0-129 months). Regarding the baseline characteristics, only elevated serum LDH (P <0.001) was found to be independently predicting survival ≤1 year. Type of first-line therapy, immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) versus BRAF/MEK targeted therapy (TT), was not predictive of long-term survival ≥5 years. For survival ≤1 year, the presence of brain metastases at treatment start was an independent predictor in BRAF-mutated patients regardless if they received TT (N=113; P=0<0.001) or ICI (N=69; P=0.015), but not in BRAF-wildtype patients who received ICI (N=161; P=0.47). Conclusions: Low serum LDH independently predicts long-term survival of stage IV melanoma patients in every subgroup of treatment type and BRAF status. Brain metastasis has a negative impact on long-term survival in BRAF-mutated, but not in BRAF-wildtype patients. Investigation of molecular features of brain metastases in BRAF-mutated vs. BRAF-wildtype melanomas may lead to new insights in tumor biology and may yield new therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.