Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028320›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Patient-centered outcomes with subcutaneous immunoglobulin use for infection control in primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: data of a GEIE Spanish Registry.

Sandra Martínez Mercader, Victor Garcia-Bustos, Pedro Moral Moral, Carmen Martínez Buenaventura, Elisa Escudero Vergara, María Carmen Montaner Bosch, Héctor Balastegui-Martín, Sonia Galindo Maycas, Berta Palací Mur, Marian Escobar Palazón and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From Donation to Innovation: New Blood-Derived Products.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sandra Martínez MercaderPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Victor Garcia-BustosPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro Moral MoralPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen Martínez BuenaventuraPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Elisa Escudero VergaraPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
María Carmen Montaner BoschPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Héctor Balastegui-MartínPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Sonia Galindo MaycasPediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Berta Palací MurPediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Marian Escobar PalazónArea of Immunology - Multidisciplinary Day Hospital, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
María Moreno MuletArea of Immunology - Multidisciplinary Day Hospital, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Campanero CarrascoImmunology Day Hospital Unit, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Alicia LópezOnco-Hematology Day Hospital, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Daniel Hernández RuizInternal Medicine Day Hospital, Doctor Negrín University Hospital of Gran Canaria, Gran, Canaria, Spain.
Laura Ruiz-LópezClinical Immunology and Primary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Rocío Guzmán GuzmánClinical Immunology and Primary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Dafne Cabañero-NavalonPrimary Immunodeficiencies Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) has emerged as an alternative to intravenous administration for patients with primary (PID) and secondary immunodeficiencies (SID), offering benefits such as fewer systemic adverse reactions and greater patient autonomy. However, comprehensive real-world data on SCIg use, including clinical and patient-centered outcomes, remain scarce. This study, conducted by expert immunodeficiency nursing teams, assesses the clinical characteristics, reported adverse effects, and quality-of-life outcomes associated with SCIg therapy with different formulations in patients with PID and SID across Spain. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted across 8 immunodeficiency nursing units in Spain, involving 223 adult patients treated with SCIg from 2004 to 2024. Data on demographics, comorbidities, SCIg treatment characteristics, reported adverse events, and quality-of-life metrics (EuroQol-5D-3L, Gijón Scale) were collected and analyzed. Results: The cohort (61.4% female, mean age: 47.1 years) included 65% PID patients, with common variable immunodeficiency being the most frequent diagnosis (39.8%). SCIg demonstrated good tolerability overall, with no significant differences in global adverse event rates between facilitated 10% (fSCIg) and 20% formulations. However, 10% fSCIg was associated with higher reported frequencies of mild local rash (58.7% vs. 36.9%, p=0.002) and fever (10.6% vs. 1.7%, p=0.01). Quality-of-life scores indicated minimal limitations in mobility and self-care, with a mean subjective health rating of 72.7/100. Patients using 20% SCIg required fewer educational sessions for self-administration compared to the 10% group. Conclusion: The different SCIg formulations in this large, multicenter cohort was effective and generally well-tolerated, supporting its use for maintaining adequate IgG levels and promoting patient independence in PID and SID. The study's findings advocate for tailored approaches that optimize patient satisfaction and address individual needs, emphasizing the critical role of dedicated immunodeficiency nursing teams in ensuring safe, effective, and patient-centered SCIg administration.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesImmunoglobulinsImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesPrimary Immunodeficiency DiseasesRegistriesAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSpainImmunoglobulinspatient-centered outcomesprimary immunodeficiency (PID)quality of lifesecondary immunodeficiency (SID)subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg)

Identifiers

PMID40028320
PMCPMC11868073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.