Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028286›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of Odonata inferred from mitochondrial genome.

Weidong Huang, Tianyou Zhao, Mingyuan Fan, Yuange Duan, Li Tian, Hu Li, Wanzhi Cai, Fan Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Weidong HuangDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Tianyou ZhaoDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Mingyuan FanDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yuange DuanDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Li TianDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Hu LiDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Wanzhi CaiDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fan SongDepartment of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the origin and evolutionary history of Odonata are crucial, as they represent central members of the first winged lineages. Here, we assembled the largest mitogenome dataset to date, comprising 143 mitogenomes representing three suborders, 18 families, of which 53 mitogenomes were newly sequenced. Phylogenetic inferences demonstrate that the mitogenome is a powerful tool for resolving lower-level divergence within Odonata, and it falls short in addressing higher-level relationships like suborder, superfamily, and interfamily classifications. The evolutionary history of Odonata was reconstructed by incorporating 11 fossil records, estimating the origin of Odonata occurred in the Jurassic, with the Cretaceous emerging as a critical period for the initial radiation of main Odonata lineages. Furthermore, we employed fossil calibration strategies from various studies to calibrate our analyses, enabling the investigation of mito-nuclear discordance patterns in divergence time inferences. Our results revealed significant differences in divergence time estimates inferred solely from mitochondrial or nuclear data within Odonata, particularly pronounced when using older upper bounds values for fossils.

Indexed as

EntomologyEvolutionary biologyPhylogeneticsZoology

Identifiers

PMID40028286
PMCPMC11869537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.