Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028258›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2025

Development and Validation of a Risk Predictive Model for Adverse Postoperative Health Status of Elderly Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery Using Lasso-Logistic Regression.

Yu Wang, Yufan Yang, Wenting Li, Yichan Wang, Jingjing Zhang, Jingjie Wan, Xiaowen Meng, Fuhai Ji

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0003-5564-0929
Yufan Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wenting Li *Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yichan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing ZhangInstitute of Anesthesiology, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jingjie WanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowen MengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6961-8683
Fuhai JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-665X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The postoperative health status of elderly patients has a substantial impact on both the individuals themselves and their families, and this impact became more pronounced with advancing age. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors that can predict the health status of patients aged 80 and over after major abdominal surgery and to establish a nomogram model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of elderly patients (aged 80+) who underwent major abdominal surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2017 to June 2023. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression analysis was employed to identify potential perioperative factors associated with the patients' health status one year post-surgery. Subsequently, logistic regression was then used to refine these factors for the model. The nomogram's performance was assessed through discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility in both training and validation datasets. Results: In total, 576 and 145 individuals were allocated to the training and validation sets, respectively. Lasso regression first identified 10 variables as candidate risk factors. After further screening through univariate and multivariate logistic regression, it was confirmed that seven variables, including tumor, operative duration, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), blood transfusion, direct bilirubin, erythrocyte, and self-care, were included in the final nomogram model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test, with a P-value of 0.835, indicates that the model was well-fitted. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) for the model on the training set was 0.81 (95% CI 0.764-0.855), and for the validation set, it was 0.83 (95% CI 0.751-0.91). Additionally, the calibration curves and decision curve analyses in both the training and validation sets demonstrated the accuracy and clinical applicability of the predictive model. Conclusion: The nomogram has a good predictive ability for the health status of older patients aged 80 years and above after abdominal surgery for one year, which can help clinical doctors develop better treatment plans.

Indexed as

AbdomenHealth StatusNomogramsPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curve80 and overagedhealth statusmajor abdominal surgerynomogrampostoperative

Identifiers

PMID40028258
PMCPMC11871953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.