ReviewBiomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.)2025
Heterogeneous and Composite Bioinks for 3D-Bioprinting of Complex Tissue.
Review in Biomedical materials & devices (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical Systematic Review of 3D Bioprinting in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Optimization of Bioink Formulations and Bioprinting Conditions for Enhanced Cell Viability in Particle-Containing Constructs.Polymers · 2026Article
- Cardiac microphysiological systems in cardiovascular research: Construction paradigms, maturation trajectories, and translational frontiers.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Nano Bioinks in Bioprinting: Functional Materials, Engineering Strategies, and Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bioprinting Organs-Science or Fiction?-A Review From Students to Students.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- A Thermoresponsive, Electrically Conductive Bioink Optimized for Electroactive Tissue Engineering and Bioelectronics.ACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- 3D biofabricated in vitro models as new approach methodologies for animal alternatives.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Approaching Scarless Wound Healing: From Passive Anti-Fibrotic to Proactive and Programmable Pro-Regenerative Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Processes, and Emerging Applications.Micromachines · 2026Review
- 3D Bioprinted Natural Hydrogels: Rheological Characterization, Cytotoxicity, and Printability Assessment of a Polysaccharide-Based Bioink.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Rheological, Structural, and Biological Trade-Offs in Bioink Design for 3D Bioprinting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Conductive biological materials for in vitro models: properties and sustainability implications.In vitro models · 2025Article
- Microgel-based bioink for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting and its applications in tissue engineering.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Bone Tissue Engineering: Enhancing the Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Evaluating cells metabolic activity of bioinks for bioprinting: the role of cell-laden hydrogels and 3D printing on cell survival.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Clinical translation of 3D bioprinting in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction: Recent progress and future directions.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioink composition is a key consideration for the 3D-bioprinting of complex and stable structures used to model tissues and as tissue constructs for regenerative medicine. An emerging and industrially important area of research is the use of micro- and nanofillers to improve bioink performance without dramatically altering the physicochemical properties of the polymeric material that forms the bulk of the printed structure. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of emerging nanomaterial fillers designed to create heterogeneous and composite bioinks for 3D-bioprinting of complex functional tissues. We outline the criteria that must be considered when developing such a bioink and discuss applications where the fillers impart stimuli responsiveness, e.g., when exposed to magnetic fields, electrical fields, and light. We further highlight how the use of such fillers can enable non-destructive imaging to monitor scaffold placement and integrity following implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.