ArticlePeerJ2025
Computational modelling reveals the influence of object similarity and proximity on visually guided movements.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper aims to understand how humans reach for a single target object in multi-object scenes. In a previous empirical study, human subjects were asked to execute reaches to a single target among non-targets (choice reaching task). In the current work, we re-analysed the human data and implemented a neurobiologically-plausible cognitive robotics model (choice reaching with a LEGO arm robot, CoRLEGO) that mimics human reaches in the choice reaching task. The results from the experiment confirmed the commonly made assumption that proximity and similarity between objects (also termed perceptual grouping) affect the quality of the reaches. However, what was novel here was that modelling the reaches also allowed to temporally separate these factors, as the start of the movement was affected by both factors while the reach trajectory was affected only by proximity between target and distractor objects indicating that human information processing of visual stimuli applies these factors in a serial fashion. In particular, our model architecture and the optimised parameter settings suggest that object proximity directly influences the movement onset. In addition, our computational model confirmed this interpretation but also revealed that the relationship between the two factors may be affected by how the participants balanced speed (starting time of the movement) and accuracy of reaching (straightness of reaches). Future research will need to test whether this plausible prediction is correct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.