ArticlePeerJ2025
Prediction of cancer cell line-specific synergistic drug combinations based on multi-omics data.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Characterizing clinical toxicity in cancer combination therapies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- SynergyGraph: predicting cell line specific drug combination synergy scores using knowledge graph representation and hypergraph modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared to single-drug therapy, combination therapy involves the use of two or more drugs to reduce drug dosage, decrease drug toxicity, and improve treatment efficacy. We developed an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-based drug-drug cell line prediction model (XDDC) to predict synergistic drug combinations. XDDC was based on XGBoost and used one of the largest drug combination datasets, NCI-ALMANAC. In XDDC, drug chemical structures, adverse drug reactions, and target information were selected as drug features; gene expression, methylation, mutations, copy number variations, and RNA interference data were used as cell line features; and pathway information was incorporated to link drug features and cell line features. XDDC improved the interpretability of drug combination features and outperformed other machine learning methods. It achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.966 ± 0.002 and an AUPR of 0.957 ± 0.002 when cross-validated on NCI-ALMANAC data. Different types of omics data were evaluated and compared in the model. Literature and experimental verification confirmed some of our predictions. XDDC could help medical professionals to rapidly screen synergistic drug combinations against specific cancer cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.