Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028209›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Prediction of cancer cell line-specific synergistic drug combinations based on multi-omics data.

Jiaqi Chen, Huirui Han, Lingxu Li, Zhengxin Chen, Xinying Liu, Tianyi Li, Xuefeng Wang, Qibin Wang, Ruijie Zhang, Dehua Feng and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jiaqi Chen *College of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Huirui Han *College of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Lingxu LiCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Zhengxin ChenCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Xinying LiuCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Tianyi LiCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Xuefeng WangCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Qibin WangCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Ruijie ZhangCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Dehua FengCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Lei YuCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Xia LiCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Limei WangCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Bing LiCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Jin LiCollege of Biomedical Information and Engineering, Kidney Disease Research Institute at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Hainan Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to single-drug therapy, combination therapy involves the use of two or more drugs to reduce drug dosage, decrease drug toxicity, and improve treatment efficacy. We developed an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-based drug-drug cell line prediction model (XDDC) to predict synergistic drug combinations. XDDC was based on XGBoost and used one of the largest drug combination datasets, NCI-ALMANAC. In XDDC, drug chemical structures, adverse drug reactions, and target information were selected as drug features; gene expression, methylation, mutations, copy number variations, and RNA interference data were used as cell line features; and pathway information was incorporated to link drug features and cell line features. XDDC improved the interpretability of drug combination features and outperformed other machine learning methods. It achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.966 ± 0.002 and an AUPR of 0.957 ± 0.002 when cross-validated on NCI-ALMANAC data. Different types of omics data were evaluated and compared in the model. Literature and experimental verification confirmed some of our predictions. XDDC could help medical professionals to rapidly screen synergistic drug combinations against specific cancer cell lines.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDrug SynergismNeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug CombinationsHumansMachine LearningMultiomicsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CombinationsCancerDrug combinationDrug synergy predictionMachine learningMulti-omics

Identifiers

PMID40028209
PMCPMC11869890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.