ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
A cross-sectional study on the association between executive functions and social disabilities in people with a psychotic disorder.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-reported cognitive functioning on the behavior rating inventory of executive function in psychotic disorders: Effects of gender, education and cognitive functioning.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social recovery (SR) in people with psychotic disorders involves taking on social roles and completing daily tasks. Functional recovery (FR), particularly executive functions, is critical for these roles. Psychotic disorder patients often experience severe cognitive impairments, especially in executive functions. This study investigates the relationship between functional and social recovery in individuals with psychotic disorders and examines the effect of employment status on this association. Method: This cross-sectional study involved people with a psychotic disorder. SR was measured using the WHO-DAS, divided into Daily Functioning (DF) and Social Functioning (SF) scales. FR was measured using the BRIEF-A and the TOL. Employment status was categorized into Non-active, Otherwise Active, and Active. The Likelihood-ratio Test (LRT) was used for model selection. Results: Data from 251 participants (mean age 41.5) showed that the BRIEF-A affected both DF and SF, while the TOL only affected DF. Only being Otherwise Active influenced DF. Employment status had no influence on SF. Being Otherwise Active positively influenced perceived disabilities in Daily Functioning. Conclusion: Measuring executive functions using both performance-based and self-report measures is important. Both measures are associated differently with perceived disabilities in daily and social functioning. Being a volunteer or looking for a job positively influences perceived disabilities in Daily Functioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.