Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028131›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Overlap of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded and Fresh-Frozen Matched Tissues for Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics.

Erin M Humphries, Peter G Hains, Phillip J Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erin M HumphriesProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7186-0620
Peter G HainsProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-1760
Phillip J RobinsonProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7878-0313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) studies have compared formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues with matched fresh-frozen (FF) tissues to examine the effect of preservation techniques on the proteome; however, few studies have included the phosphoproteome. A high degree of overlap and correlation between the two preservation techniques would demonstrate the importance of FFPE tissues as a valuable biomedical resource. Our aim was to quantitatively compare the proteome and phosphoproteome of matched FFPE and FF tissues using data-independent acquisition LC-MS. Four organs from three rats were cut in half to produce matched FFPE and FF tissue pairs. Excellent overlaps of 85-97% for the proteome and 82-98% for the phosphoproteome were observed, depending on the organ type, between the two preservation techniques. Most of the unique identifications were found in FF with less than 0.3% being unique to FFPE tissues. Strong agreement between FFPE and FF matched tissue pairs was observed with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.93-0.97 and 0.79-0.87 for the proteome and phosphoproteome, respectively. Digestion efficiency was slightly higher in FFPE (92-94%) than in FF tissues (86-89%), and a search of a data subset for formaldehyde induced chemical modifications revealed that only 0.05% of precursors were unique to FFPE tissues. This suggests that with quality sample preparation methods it is not necessary to include formaldehyde induced chemical modifications when analyzing FFPE tissues. We attribute the lower number of identifications in FFPE tissues to inaccurate peptide quantitation, which resulted in a lower MS peptide load and tryptic peptide enrichment load. Our results demonstrate that both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of FFPE and FF tissues are highly comparable and highlight the suitability of FFPE tissues for both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis.

Identifiers

PMID40028131
PMCPMC11865994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.