ArticleACS omega2025
Machine Learning-Driven Data Fusion of Chromatograms, Plasmagrams, and IR Spectra of Chemical Compounds of Forensic Interest.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues: a review 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Achieving fast analytical results on-site with the highest possible accuracy in forensic analyses is crucial for investigations. While portable sensors are essential for crime scene analysis, they often face limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially due to environmental factors. Data fusion (DF) techniques can enhance accuracy and reliability by combining information from multiple sensors. This study develops different DF approaches using data from two sensors: ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and gas chromatography-quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (GC-QEPAS), aiming to improve the safety of crime scene operators and the accuracy of on-site forensic analysis. Two DF approaches were developed for acetone and DMMP: low-level (LLDF) and mid-level (MLDF), meanwhile a high-level (HLDF) approach was applied to TATP. LLDF concatenated preprocessed data matrices, while MLDF employed principal component analysis for feature extraction. LLDF and MLDF used one-class support vector machines (OC-SVM) for classification, while HLDF combined OC-SVM for IMS and SIMCA for GC-QEPAS. Sensor location within crime scenes was established using traditional measuring tape and laser distance meters, with a 1 m cutoff distance between sensors deemed appropriate for indoor crime scenes. LLDF achieved high accuracy but was sensitive to concentration variations, while MLDF enhanced the classification robustness. HLDF allowed for independent sensor use in real scenarios. All of the methods reached 100% accuracy for DMMP and acetone, and the MLDF approach was the fastest among the DF methods, demonstrating its potential for rapid applications. DF approaches can significantly enhance the safety and accuracy of forensic investigations, with future research planned to extend data sets and include more sensors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.