Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028072›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Machine Learning-Driven Data Fusion of Chromatograms, Plasmagrams, and IR Spectra of Chemical Compounds of Forensic Interest.

Giorgio Felizzato, Giuliano Iacobellis, Nicola Liberatore, Sandro Mengali, Martin Sabo, Patrizia Scandurra, Roberto Viola, Francesco Saverio Romolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giorgio FelizzatoUniversity of Bergamo, Via Moroni 255, Bergamo 24127, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6181-2243
Giuliano IacobellisRaggruppamento Carabinieri Investigazioni Scientifiche, Reparto Ricerca e Sviluppo of Rome, Viale di Tor di Quinto, 119, Rome 00191, Italy.
Nicola LiberatoreConsorzio CREO, L'Aquila 67100, Italy.
Sandro MengaliConsorzio CREO, L'Aquila 67100, Italy.
Martin SaboMaSa Tech, s.r.o., Sadová 3018/10, Stará Turá 916 01, Slovakia.
Patrizia ScandurraUniversity of Bergamo, Via Moroni 255, Bergamo 24127, Italy.
Roberto ViolaConsorzio CREO, L'Aquila 67100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2529-1011
Francesco Saverio RomoloUniversity of Bergamo, Via Moroni 255, Bergamo 24127, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving fast analytical results on-site with the highest possible accuracy in forensic analyses is crucial for investigations. While portable sensors are essential for crime scene analysis, they often face limitations in sensitivity and specificity, especially due to environmental factors. Data fusion (DF) techniques can enhance accuracy and reliability by combining information from multiple sensors. This study develops different DF approaches using data from two sensors: ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and gas chromatography-quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (GC-QEPAS), aiming to improve the safety of crime scene operators and the accuracy of on-site forensic analysis. Two DF approaches were developed for acetone and DMMP: low-level (LLDF) and mid-level (MLDF), meanwhile a high-level (HLDF) approach was applied to TATP. LLDF concatenated preprocessed data matrices, while MLDF employed principal component analysis for feature extraction. LLDF and MLDF used one-class support vector machines (OC-SVM) for classification, while HLDF combined OC-SVM for IMS and SIMCA for GC-QEPAS. Sensor location within crime scenes was established using traditional measuring tape and laser distance meters, with a 1 m cutoff distance between sensors deemed appropriate for indoor crime scenes. LLDF achieved high accuracy but was sensitive to concentration variations, while MLDF enhanced the classification robustness. HLDF allowed for independent sensor use in real scenarios. All of the methods reached 100% accuracy for DMMP and acetone, and the MLDF approach was the fastest among the DF methods, demonstrating its potential for rapid applications. DF approaches can significantly enhance the safety and accuracy of forensic investigations, with future research planned to extend data sets and include more sensors.

Identifiers

PMID40028072
PMCPMC11865979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.