ArticleBio-protocol2025
Quantification of Neuromuscular Junctions in Zebrafish Cranial Muscles.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trigeminal and facial branchiomotor neurons have shared muscle targets in zebrafish larvae.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Communication between motor neurons and muscles is established by specialized synaptic connections known as neuromuscular junctions (NMJs). Altered morphology or numbers of NMJs in the developing muscles can indicate a disease phenotype. The distribution and count of NMJs have been studied in the context of several developmental disorders in different model organisms, including zebrafish. While most of these studies involved manual counting of NMJs, a few of them employed image analysis software for automated quantification. However, these studies were primarily restricted to the trunk musculature of zebrafish. These trunk muscles have a simple and reiterated anatomy, but the cranial musculoskeletal system is much more complex. Here, we describe a stepwise protocol for the visualization and quantification of NMJs in the ventral cranial muscles of zebrafish larvae. We have used a combination of existing ImageJ plugins to develop this methodology, aiming for reproducibility and precision. The protocol allows us to analyze a specific set of cranial muscles by choosing an area of interest. Using background subtraction, pixel intensity thresholding, and watershed algorithm, the images are segmented. The binary images are then used for NMJ quantification using the Analyze Particles tool. This protocol is cost-effective because, unlike other licensed image analyzers, ImageJ is open-source and available free of cost. Key features • Immunostaining neuromuscular junctions in alcohol-exposed zebrafish. • Quantification of presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals in cranial muscles of zebrafish larvae. • Analysis of size and distribution of NMJs in cranial muscles of zebrafish larvae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.