Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40028011›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Streamlined Quantification of p-γ-H2AX Foci for DNA Damage Analysis in Melanoma and Melanocyte Co-cultures Exposed to FLASH Irradiation Using Automated Image Cytometry.

Stefana Orobeti, Ioana Dinca, Alexandra Bran, Ion Tiseanu, Felix Sima, Stefana M Petrescu, Livia E Sima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefana OrobetiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Bucharest, Romania.
Ioana DincaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma, and Radiation Physics, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Alexandra BranNational Institute for Laser, Plasma, and Radiation Physics, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Ion TiseanuNational Institute for Laser, Plasma, and Radiation Physics, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Felix SimaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma, and Radiation Physics, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Stefana M PetrescuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Bucharest, Romania.
Livia E SimaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to DNA-damaging physical or chemical agents, the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway is activated in eukaryotic cells. In the radiobiology field, it is important to assess the DNA damage effect of a certain irradiation regime on cancer cells and compare it to the effect on non-transformed cells exposed to identical conditions. The first step in the DNA repair mechanism consists of the attachment of proteins such as the phosphorylated histone γ-H2AX (p-γ-H2AX) to DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) in the nucleus, which leads to the formation of repairing foci. Therefore, imaging methods were established to evaluate the presence of foci inside the nucleus after exposure to DNA-damaging agents. This approach is superior in sensitivity to other methods, such as the comet assay or the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), that allow direct detection of cleaved DNA fragments. These electrophoresis-based methods require high ionizing radiation dosages and are difficult to reproduce compared to imaging-based assays. Conventionally, the number of foci is determined visually, with limited accuracy and throughput. Here, by exploring the effect of laser-plasma accelerated electrons FLASH irradiation on cancer cells, we describe an image cytometry protocol for the quantification of foci with increased throughput, upon large areas, with increased precision and sample-to-sample consistency. It consists of the automatic scanning of fluorescently labeled cells and using a gating strategy similar to flow cytometry to discriminate cells in co-culture based on nuclei elongation properties, followed by automatic quantification of foci number and statistical analysis. The protocol can be used to monitor the kinetics of DNA repair by quantification of p-γ-H2AX at different time points post-exposure or by quantification of other DNA repair proteins that form foci at the DNA DSB sites. Also, the protocol can be used for quantifying the response to chemical agents targeting DNA. This protocol can be performed on any type of cancer cells, and our gating strategy to discriminate cells in co-culture can also be used in other research applications. Key features • Analysis of DNA-damage sensitivity using model cancer cell lines and non-transformed cellular controls. • Allows comparative testing of various doses of DNA damaging radiation on cancer and non-transformed cells in co-culture, as well as in monocultures. • This protocol requires TissueFAXSiPlus model i12 or an alternative instrument that allows automatic image acquisition and stitching to benefit from enhanced analysis throughput. • For analyses of co-cultures or heterogeneous samples, TissueQuest software is required to selectively quantify different cell subpopulations; dedicated training is advisable before operating the system.

Indexed as

Cancer cellsDNA damageFLASH LPA electrons cell irradiationImage cytometryImmunofluorescenceγ-H2AX foci

Identifiers

PMID40028011
PMCPMC11865835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.