ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Innovation in ovary decellularization methods: Chemical and herbal detergents.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ovary provides an ideal environment for egg survival due to its distinct structure that directly contributes to the growth and maintenance of the follicle. The purpose of this study is to compare ovarian decellularization with herbal and chemical detergents. Sheep ovarian was used in this study. 1 % sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a chemical detergent and 1, 2.5, and 5 % Acanthophyllum (ACP) were used as herbal agents for decellularization. DNA content, histological characteristics, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), biocompatibility, antibacterial test, hemocompatibility, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were investigated. The results showed the DNA content in decellularization scaffolds with 1 % SDS and 5 % ACP was reduced suitably. Also, histological observations confirmed this finding, and the nuclei were completely removed in these two groups. Disorganization of collagen fibers and tissue architecture was observed more in the SDS group than in the ACP group. No group reported cytotoxicity and the best blood compatibility in decellularization with herbal agents was reported. Protein bands are largely conserved in all methods. Higher antibacterial properties were observed in the decellularization technique with ACP. Decellularization with 5%ACP, in addition to being able to completely remove cells in the tissue, can help preserve the ultrastructure of the ovary. Therefore, this plant agent can be introduced as a decellularization method for studies in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.